RE: no-llc vs inactivity dlsw dynamic peer

From: Jay Greenberg (groupstudylist@execulink.com)
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 20:23:47 GMT-3

I think that a dynamic peer will always bring down an idle SNA session
because no-llc and inactivity both default to 5 minutes. These options
only allow you to adjust the value. 

-- 
Jay Greenberg 

On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 17:10, Gary Lileikis wrote:
> TCP connections can be configured to terminate after a specific period
> of idle time (inactivity option) or after a specific period of no active
> llc sessions (no-llc option). These options are mutually exclusive of
> each other. Using the inactivity option could bring down a quiet SNA
> session that is still active.
> 
> Cheers...Gary
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Livingston [mailto:scottl@sprinthosting.net] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 4:15 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Cc: scottl@unix.sprint.net
> Subject: no-llc vs inactivity dlsw dynamic peer
> 
> 
> HMMMMMM?
>  
> So I am working the FatKid.com lab '441 Advanced DLSw' and I am looking
> at #6.  The solution used was 'inactivity' and I used 'no-llc' for the
> dynamic option.  So the question I have is; when do I use no-llc vs
> inactivity?
>  
> Thank You!
> Scott

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:07 GMT-3