From: Jay Greenberg (groupstudylist@execulink.com)
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 20:28:07 GMT-3
Where did you get 10 minutes from? the 12.1 docs say 5.
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 17:28, Robert Massiache wrote:
> When the dynamic peer connection is established, the explorer is forwarded
> to the remote peer . If the resource is found, a circuit is established and
> the remote peer remains active and terminates after ten minutes default.
>
> You can specify the no-llc keyword to modify the elapsed time to something
> other than ten minutes.
>
> Optionally, the remote peer can be configured to disconnect when there is no
> activity on any of the circuits for a prespecified amount of time
> (inactivity minutes).
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Scott Livingston" <scottl@sprinthosting.net>
> >Reply-To: "Scott Livingston" <scottl@sprinthosting.net>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >CC: <scottl@unix.sprint.net>
> >Subject: no-llc vs inactivity dlsw dynamic peer
> >Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:14:31 -0600
> >
> >HMMMMMM?
> >
> >So I am working the FatKid.com lab '441 Advanced DLSw' and I am looking
> >at #6. The solution used was 'inactivity' and I used 'no-llc' for the
> >dynamic option. So the question I have is; when do I use no-llc vs
> >inactivity?
> >
> >Thank You!
> >Scott
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:07 GMT-3