From: Scott Livingston (scottl@sprinthosting.net)
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 19:41:43 GMT-3
Thank you Robert!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Massiache [mailto:robert2140@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 4:28 PM
To: scottl@sprinthosting.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: scottl@unix.sprint.net
Subject: Re: no-llc vs inactivity dlsw dynamic peer
When the dynamic peer connection is established, the explorer is
forwarded
to the remote peer . If the resource is found, a circuit is established
and
the remote peer remains active and terminates after ten minutes default.
You can specify the no-llc keyword to modify the elapsed time to
something
other than ten minutes.
Optionally, the remote peer can be configured to disconnect when there
is no
activity on any of the circuits for a prespecified amount of time
(inactivity minutes).
thanks
>From: "Scott Livingston" <scottl@sprinthosting.net>
>Reply-To: "Scott Livingston" <scottl@sprinthosting.net>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>CC: <scottl@unix.sprint.net>
>Subject: no-llc vs inactivity dlsw dynamic peer
>Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:14:31 -0600
>
>HMMMMMM?
>
>So I am working the FatKid.com lab '441 Advanced DLSw' and I am looking
>at #6. The solution used was 'inactivity' and I used 'no-llc' for the
>dynamic option. So the question I have is; when do I use no-llc vs
>inactivity?
>
>Thank You!
>Scott
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:07 GMT-3