From: Pinku Doshi (pinkudoshi@indiatimes.com)
Date: Sat Nov 16 2002 - 23:11:30 GMT-3
Hi,
Well if we are not using the ip ospf network types then the default timers do not have any issue with the adjancecy but there might be an issue with DR in partial mesh topology.
Either the neighbor command with the priority 0 can be used or the priority of the interface can be configured to be high on hub site & 0 on the spoke site.
Do suggest if any add ons or changes.
Thanks
Pinku P doshi
"eric" wrote:
You have 2 issues to address here take a look at the timers on the diff.
interfaces and then address any DR issues that might come up.
~e
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Nate Kleven
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 12:33 PM
To: 'CCIElab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: OSPF On NBMA with a twist
R2
/ \
/ \
/ \
R4 R3
Hub and Spoke Topology
R2 Has a PVC to R4 and R3
- R2/R3/R4 Share the 10.10.10.0/27 Network
- R4 Must be configured using a Physical Interface
- R3 & R2 Must be configured using Sub-interfaces
- R2's Serial Subinterface must be configured as a multipoint interface, not
a Non-broadcast.
- You may not use the "IP OSPF NETWORK" command on R3
I have not been able to get this working and meet all th requirements.
Anyone out there seen this before?
Thanks in advance.
Nate
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com
Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in
Change the way you talk. Indiatimes presents "Valufon", Your PC to Phone service with clear voice at rates far less than the normal ISD rates. Go to http://www.valufon.indiatimes.com. Choose your plan. BUY NOW.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:02 GMT-3