From: Larson, Chris (CLarson@usaid.gov)
Date: Thu Nov 14 2002 - 11:50:17 GMT-3
Oh right. Sorry I was thinking of rsvp.
RSVP 20 40
my bad. Would that work? Or why not?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: liuyi [SMTP:a_netbug4@sina.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 1:00 PM
> To: Larson, Chris
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to reserve bandwidht
> for voice s essions!!
>
> I do not think so.Ip rtp priority command used for only one flow
> bandwidth.In
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_command_re
> ference_chapter09186a008008078c.html#xtocid1495214
> the example is for VoIP:
> ip rtp priority 16384 16383 40
>
> correct me if i am wrong
>
>
> >Why would you not use IP RTP priority 20 40 ? Wouldn't that allocate
> 20k
> >per sessions with a 40k max for all sessions?
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: A.Gesse [SMTP:A.Gesse@race.ru]
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 6:53 AM
> >> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> >> Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to reserve bandwidht for
> >> voice sessions!!
> >>
> >> RSVP may be a choice
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On
> >> > Behalf Of Angelo De Guzman
> >> > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:32 AM
> >> > To: Ayman Hamza; deepesh@cisco.com
> >> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to reserve
> >> > bandwidht for voice sessions!!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hi Ayman and all,
> >> > Do we have a consensus on how are we going to solve
> >> > this?
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Angelo
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- Ayman Hamza <ayhamza@cisco.com> wrote:
> >> > > Deepesh;
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks for your reply. To end this discussion , I
> >> > > believe that the correct
> >> > > answer is :
> >> > >
> >> > > Use ip rtp priority queueing to allocate the 40kb/s
> >> > > pipe. Then use
> >> > > LLQ to allocate the 20kb/s sessions.
> >> > >
> >> > > And ofcourse this solution should be configured on
> >> > > all the possible
> >> > > outbound interfaces that leads to alternative
> >> > > destination voice dialer-peer.
> >> > >
> >> > > PLS concure this if it's possible !
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards;
> >> > > Ayman
> >> > >
> >> > > > From deepesh@cisco.com Wed Oct 30 19:48:05 2002
> >> > > > From: "Deepesh Chouhan" <deepesh@cisco.com>
> >> > > > To: "Ayman Hamza" <ayhamza@cisco.com>,
> >> > > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >> > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to
> >> > > reserve bandwidht for voice sessions!!
> >> > > > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:45:57 -0800
> >> > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >> > > > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> >> > > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >> > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416
> >> > > (9.0.2910.0)
> >> > > > X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
> >> > > V6.00.2600.0000
> >> > > > Importance: Normal
> >> > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > The ""exact"" wording of the question is:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > All the voice traffic through frame
> >> > > relay interface of R6 - R6 is
> >> > > > > > > > > the hub router - should guarantee a
> >> > > bandwidth of 40kb/s . Each
> >> > > > > > > > > voice session
> >> > > > > > > > > should have 20kb/s .
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > This means :
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > When there is any voice traffic, 40kb/s must be
> >> > > allocated immediately
> >> > > > > to the voice traffic on the DLCI it carries the
> >> > > voice, and each
> >> > > > > voice session
> >> > > > > should be allocated 20kb/s once a voice traffic
> >> > > is there . (Which
> >> > > > > measn clearly
> >> > > > > even if there is no congestion on the outbount
> >> > > frame relay interface .
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I hope I have clarified the whole question
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks for the clarification. I don't know the
> >> > > answer for this. We are
> >> > > > talking about creating a 40 K pipe and then
> >> > > allocating a chunk (20 K) within
> >> > > > it.
> >> > > > So some sort of FQ inside a PQ :)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > As Aansar suggested, on each router we can put
> >> > > LLQ, and then use RSVP to
> >> > > > create 20 K per session. But rsvp is not allowed.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > thanks
> >> > > > deepesh
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Regards;
> >> > > > > Ayman
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > From deepesh@cisco.com Wed Oct 30 00:39:52
> >> > > 2002
> >> > > > > > From: "Deepesh Chouhan" <deepesh@cisco.com>
> >> > > > > > To: "Ayman Hamza" <ayhamza@cisco.com>
> >> > > > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to
> >> > > reserve bandwidht
> >> > > > > for voice sessions!!
> >> > > > > > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:38:14 -0800
> >> > > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> > > > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >> > > > > > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> >> > > > > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >> > > > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build
> >> > > 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
> >> > > > > > Importance: Normal
> >> > > > > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
> >> > > V6.00.2600.0000
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hi
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Sorry, I didn't get the question earlier
> >> > > > > > What the question says is to have
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > 1.
> >> > > > > > PQ for all voice traffic = 40 K
> >> > > > > > AND
> >> > > > > > Each voice session = 20 K
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > OR it means
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > 2.
> >> > > > > > PQ for all voice traffic = 40 K
> >> > > > > > AND
> >> > > > > > Each voice session <= 20 K
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Can you verify that ?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Your solution won't work here
> >> > > > > > Reason is that bandwidth specified in ip rtp
> >> > > priority cmd is
> >> > > > > meant for all
> >> > > > > > calls.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
> >> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12
> >> > > > > 0newft/120
> >> > > > > > t/120t7/friprtp.htm
> >> > > > > > (look for maximum total bandwidth string)
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Also frame-relay voice bandwidth command is
> >> > > useless, when used
> >> > > > > with ip rtp
> >> > > > > > priority as ip rtp command, takes precedence
> >> > > over any other
> >> > > > > configuration
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Let me know the specifics of questions ...
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On a side note, if this is in exam, can we ask
> >> > > proctor to
> >> > > > > clarify this ? Are
> >> > > > > > they aware of all questions ?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > thanks
> >> > > > > > Deepesh
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> >> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> >> > > > > > > Ayman Hamza
> >> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:01 PM
> >> > > > > > > To: deepesh@cisco.com
> >> > > > > > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> > > > > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to
> >> > > reserve
> >> > > > > bandwidht for voice
> >> > > > > > > sessions!!
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Hi Deepesh;
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Thanks for your reply. But I don't see how
> >> > > you are allocating
> >> > > > > (reserve)
> >> > > > > > > 20kb/s for each session!! CBWFQ/LLQ won't
> >> > > help in this,
> >> > > > > right? PLS advise!
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Ayman
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > From nobody@groupstudy.com Tue Oct 29
> >> > > 03:14:10 2002
> >> > > > > > > > From: "Deepesh Chouhan"
> >> > > <deepesh@cisco.com>
> >> > > > > > > > To: "Ayman Hamza" <ayhamza@cisco.com>,
> >> > > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>,
> >> > > > > > > > <ayman_hamza@hotmail.com>
> >> > > > > > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How
> >> > > to reserve
> >> > > > > bandwidht for voice
> >> > > > > > > > sessions!!
> >> > > > > > > > Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:49:05 -0800
> >> > > > > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> > > > > > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >> > > > > > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build
> >> > > 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
> >> > > > > > > > X-ASK-Info: Confirmed by user
> >> > > > > > > > Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
> >> > > > > > > > Reply-To: "Deepesh Chouhan"
> >> > > <deepesh@cisco.com>
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Hi
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Cisco has fixed the problem. You should be
> >> > > getting emails
> >> > > > > on your cisco
> >> > > > > > > > account now.
> >> > >
> >> > === message truncated ===
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > __________________________________________________
> >> > Do you Yahoo!?
> >> > Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
> >> > http://webhosting.yahoo.com
>
> ?
> ?!
>
> liuyi
> a_netbug4@sina.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:59 GMT-3