From: liuyi (a_netbug4@sina.com)
Date: Thu Nov 14 2002 - 11:42:05 GMT-3
I do not think so.Ip rtp priority command used for only one flow bandwidth.In
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_command_reference_chapter09186a008008078c.html#xtocid1495214
the example is for VoIP:
ip rtp priority 16384 16383 40
correct me if i am wrong
>Why would you not use IP RTP priority 20 40 ? Wouldn't that allocate 20k
>per sessions with a 40k max for all sessions?
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: A.Gesse [SMTP:A.Gesse@race.ru]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 6:53 AM
>> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>> Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to reserve bandwidht for
>> voice sessions!!
>>
>> RSVP may be a choice
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On
>> > Behalf Of Angelo De Guzman
>> > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:32 AM
>> > To: Ayman Hamza; deepesh@cisco.com
>> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to reserve
>> > bandwidht for voice sessions!!
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Ayman and all,
>> > Do we have a consensus on how are we going to solve
>> > this?
>> > Thanks,
>> > Angelo
>> >
>> >
>> > --- Ayman Hamza <ayhamza@cisco.com> wrote:
>> > > Deepesh;
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for your reply. To end this discussion , I
>> > > believe that the correct
>> > > answer is :
>> > >
>> > > Use ip rtp priority queueing to allocate the 40kb/s
>> > > pipe. Then use
>> > > LLQ to allocate the 20kb/s sessions.
>> > >
>> > > And ofcourse this solution should be configured on
>> > > all the possible
>> > > outbound interfaces that leads to alternative
>> > > destination voice dialer-peer.
>> > >
>> > > PLS concure this if it's possible !
>> > >
>> > > Regards;
>> > > Ayman
>> > >
>> > > > From deepesh@cisco.com Wed Oct 30 19:48:05 2002
>> > > > From: "Deepesh Chouhan" <deepesh@cisco.com>
>> > > > To: "Ayman Hamza" <ayhamza@cisco.com>,
>> > > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to
>> > > reserve bandwidht for voice sessions!!
>> > > > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:45:57 -0800
>> > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
>> > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> > > > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>> > > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>> > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416
>> > > (9.0.2910.0)
>> > > > X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
>> > > V6.00.2600.0000
>> > > > Importance: Normal
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The ""exact"" wording of the question is:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > All the voice traffic through frame
>> > > relay interface of R6 - R6 is
>> > > > > > > > > the hub router - should guarantee a
>> > > bandwidth of 40kb/s . Each
>> > > > > > > > > voice session
>> > > > > > > > > should have 20kb/s .
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This means :
>> > > > >
>> > > > > When there is any voice traffic, 40kb/s must be
>> > > allocated immediately
>> > > > > to the voice traffic on the DLCI it carries the
>> > > voice, and each
>> > > > > voice session
>> > > > > should be allocated 20kb/s once a voice traffic
>> > > is there . (Which
>> > > > > measn clearly
>> > > > > even if there is no congestion on the outbount
>> > > frame relay interface .
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I hope I have clarified the whole question
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for the clarification. I don't know the
>> > > answer for this. We are
>> > > > talking about creating a 40 K pipe and then
>> > > allocating a chunk (20 K) within
>> > > > it.
>> > > > So some sort of FQ inside a PQ :)
>> > > >
>> > > > As Aansar suggested, on each router we can put
>> > > LLQ, and then use RSVP to
>> > > > create 20 K per session. But rsvp is not allowed.
>> > > >
>> > > > thanks
>> > > > deepesh
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards;
>> > > > > Ayman
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > From deepesh@cisco.com Wed Oct 30 00:39:52
>> > > 2002
>> > > > > > From: "Deepesh Chouhan" <deepesh@cisco.com>
>> > > > > > To: "Ayman Hamza" <ayhamza@cisco.com>
>> > > > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to
>> > > reserve bandwidht
>> > > > > for voice sessions!!
>> > > > > > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:38:14 -0800
>> > > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
>> > > > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> > > > > > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>> > > > > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>> > > > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build
>> > > 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
>> > > > > > Importance: Normal
>> > > > > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
>> > > V6.00.2600.0000
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Sorry, I didn't get the question earlier
>> > > > > > What the question says is to have
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 1.
>> > > > > > PQ for all voice traffic = 40 K
>> > > > > > AND
>> > > > > > Each voice session = 20 K
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > OR it means
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 2.
>> > > > > > PQ for all voice traffic = 40 K
>> > > > > > AND
>> > > > > > Each voice session <= 20 K
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Can you verify that ?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Your solution won't work here
>> > > > > > Reason is that bandwidth specified in ip rtp
>> > > priority cmd is
>> > > > > meant for all
>> > > > > > calls.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12
>> > > > > 0newft/120
>> > > > > > t/120t7/friprtp.htm
>> > > > > > (look for maximum total bandwidth string)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Also frame-relay voice bandwidth command is
>> > > useless, when used
>> > > > > with ip rtp
>> > > > > > priority as ip rtp command, takes precedence
>> > > over any other
>> > > > > configuration
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Let me know the specifics of questions ...
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On a side note, if this is in exam, can we ask
>> > > proctor to
>> > > > > clarify this ? Are
>> > > > > > they aware of all questions ?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > thanks
>> > > > > > Deepesh
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
>> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>> > > > > > > Ayman Hamza
>> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:01 PM
>> > > > > > > To: deepesh@cisco.com
>> > > > > > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > > > > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How to
>> > > reserve
>> > > > > bandwidht for voice
>> > > > > > > sessions!!
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Deepesh;
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks for your reply. But I don't see how
>> > > you are allocating
>> > > > > (reserve)
>> > > > > > > 20kb/s for each session!! CBWFQ/LLQ won't
>> > > help in this,
>> > > > > right? PLS advise!
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Ayman
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > From nobody@groupstudy.com Tue Oct 29
>> > > 03:14:10 2002
>> > > > > > > > From: "Deepesh Chouhan"
>> > > <deepesh@cisco.com>
>> > > > > > > > To: "Ayman Hamza" <ayhamza@cisco.com>,
>> > > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>,
>> > > > > > > > <ayman_hamza@hotmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > Subject: RE: CCIE LAB VOICE question, How
>> > > to reserve
>> > > > > bandwidht for voice
>> > > > > > > > sessions!!
>> > > > > > > > Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:49:05 -0800
>> > > > > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
>> > > > > > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> > > > > > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build
>> > > 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
>> > > > > > > > X-ASK-Info: Confirmed by user
>> > > > > > > > Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
>> > > > > > > > Reply-To: "Deepesh Chouhan"
>> > > <deepesh@cisco.com>
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Cisco has fixed the problem. You should be
>> > > getting emails
>> > > > > on your cisco
>> > > > > > > > account now.
>> > >
>> > === message truncated ===
>> >
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________
>> > Do you Yahoo!?
>> > Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
>> > http://webhosting.yahoo.com
VB
@q#!
liuyi
a_netbug4@sina.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:59 GMT-3