MAC address filtering canonical vs non-canonical

From: Rich Doty (rdoty@meridiantelesis.com)
Date: Wed Nov 13 2002 - 12:13:38 GMT-3

Next message: Tim Devries: "RE: VPN on Cisco Router"
Previous message: Paul Browning: "RE: Nat issue"
Next in thread: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de: "RE: MAC address filtering canonical vs non-canonical"
Maybe reply: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de: "RE: MAC address filtering canonical vs non-canonical"
Maybe reply: Andrew Bratchell: "RE: MAC address filtering canonical vs non-canonical"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I'm confused as to when I should use canonical (ethernet) and when I
should use non-canonical (token ring) addressing. Now that Token Ring is
gone for the lab there still remains some DLSW filtering
issues/concerns.

Is it ok to now always use canonical addressing (with Token Ring gone --
I've heard this), or must I convert when I want to create certain
filters? Does anyone have difinitive breakdown on how this works?

Thanks,

Rich

Next message: Tim Devries: "RE: VPN on Cisco Router"
Previous message: Paul Browning: "RE: Nat issue"
Next in thread: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de: "RE: MAC address filtering canonical vs non-canonical"
Maybe reply: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de: "RE: MAC address filtering canonical vs non-canonical"
Maybe reply: Andrew Bratchell: "RE: MAC address filtering canonical vs non-canonical"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:58 GMT-3