From: Desmond (cciestudy@sympatico.ca)
Date: Sat Nov 09 2002 - 21:10:05 GMT-3
The EIGRP stub is not as good as OSPF. I cannot find any reallife scenario
for it. I can redistribute any connected interfaces or static routes without
using it.
Can anyone provide me some examples ?
Thanks !
Desmond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Martin" <jmartin@capitalpremium.net>
To: "Tom Young" <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:41 AM
Subject: RE: eigrp stub
> Tom,
>
> Straight from CCO EIGRP configuration Guide:
>
> The connected keyword will permit the EIGRP Stub Routing feature to send
> connected routes. If the connected routes are not covered by a network
> statement, it may be necessary to redistribute connected routes with the
> redistribute connected command under the EIGRP process. This option is
> enabled by default.
>
> See
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c
> /ipcprt2/1cdeigrp.htm
>
> HTH,
>
> Joe Martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Tom
> Young
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 6:23 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: eigrp stub
>
>
> hi, group
>
> I tried the eigrp's stub command yesterday. For the
> connected network, if I use the
> eigrp stub connected
> command , it should be distributed naturally into eigrp
> AS. But I couldn't see the network from remote. Certainly
> I set the command in a spoke router, and all of the
> routers in the same AS.
>
> Thanks
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! BB is Broadband by Yahoo! http://bb.yahoo.co.jp/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:55 GMT-3