RE: Multiple Compnay Connections to Internet Via ADSL

From: Pratt, Jeremy (JPratt@coh.org)
Date: Fri Nov 08 2002 - 15:54:20 GMT-3


Only problem with catalyst vlan's is that the vlan's sometimes leak into
each other. You'll need one interface per company plus one for the DSL
ethernet. Based on this your 2621 4 pt EE plus the two onboards will suffice
. If you need another ethernet interface in the future you could get a adsl
module for your router. Make sure you max the memory and flash(64/16).

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Wodle [mailto:peter_wodle@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 7:17 AM
To: michael625@cox.net
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Multiple Compnay Connections to Internet Via ADSL

How about using catalyst switches with private vlans to protect switch
ports?

This way I understand that you can isolate traffic between ports on the
switch using a common IP Address.

>From: Michael Popovich <michael625@cox.net>
>Reply-To: michael625@cox.net
>To: "Peter Wodle" <peter_wodle@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: Multiple Compnay Connections to Internet Via ADSL
>Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:14:09 -0500
>
>I would think the cheaper way would be to trunk vlans for each of the
>companies. You don't have to worry about bandwidth issues.
>
>Michael Popovich
> >
> > From: "Peter Wodle" <peter_wodle@hotmail.com>
> > Date: 2002/11/07 Thu PM 04:47:42 EST
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > CC: security@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Multiple Compnay Connections to Internet Via ADSL
> >
> > Hi All
> >
> > Can you please help on this. What is a cheap way of serving around 5 (or

>may
> > be 6) compnaies in the same building with say 20 PCs so that they can
> > connect to Internet with one ADSL line? They must not see each other as
>they
> > are seperate companies.
> >
> > What I'm thinking:
> > 1) 2621 with 4E NM card. One interafce to ADSL router with legal address
> > (i.e. External LAN). Others interafces to each compnay hub with Private
>IP
> > addressess (i.e. internal LANs). Most private IPs to be NATed with
>overload
> > on the exteranl router IP address. Some server IPs to be NATed usind one

>to
> > one NAT.
> > 2) Using may 2621. One interafce to ADSL router with legal address (i.e.
> > External LAN). Other internal interafce to be trunked to a Catalyst.
> > Internal FE to be sliced so that there are as many subinterfaces as the
> > companies. Cat to have as many VLANs as companies.
> >
> > Does this sound ok? Aany better/cheaper way?
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
> > http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:55 GMT-3