From: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de
Date: Mon Nov 04 2002 - 18:29:29 GMT-3
Ok Jason,
Your answer makes me feel good because I thought that I was missing
something. Good luck in your preparation.
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Miller [mailto:jasmille@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Ipexpert solution is driving me nuts
Sam,
I have seen a lot of mistakes with the solutions as well. Several errors
have been similar to yours where the problem tells you to do one thing and
the solution totally disregards it. I haven't gotten to lab 25 yet. For
the $ the book cost, you would hope they would have fewer mistakes.
Jason
At 03:11 PM 11/4/2002 -0500, Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de wrote:
>Hello group,
>
>I do not usually try to blame the scenario of the solution for my short
>comings. However, the Ipexpert solutions provided in their web site is
>full of mistakes (I think) Is any person out there experiencing this
>problem or I should look harder in the wording and the solutions? For
>example, lab 25 says the frame relay subnet of 170.1.100.0/24 should
>not be further subnetted. However, the solution creates two subnets one
>between R2 and R4 and the second between R2, R5 and R6. Thanks for your
>help.
>
>Sam
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:53 GMT-3