From: Ivan Centeno (icenteno2001@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Nov 04 2002 - 18:40:40 GMT-3
Jason, Sam
I agree with you. The solutions have very doubtful
issues. I like the labs because they are very complete
and I accept that I misunderstood some wording but the
solutions need to revised.
Ivan
--- Jason Miller <jasmille@cisco.com> wrote:
> Sam,
>
> I have seen a lot of mistakes with the solutions as
> well. Several errors have been similar to yours
> where the problem tells you to do one thing and the
> solution totally disregards it. I haven't gotten to
> lab 25 yet. For the $ the book cost, you would hope
> they would have fewer mistakes.
>
> Jason
>
> At 03:11 PM 11/4/2002 -0500,
> Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de wrote:
> >Hello group,
> >
> >I do not usually try to blame the scenario of the
> solution for my short
> >comings. However, the Ipexpert solutions provided
> in their web site is full
> >of mistakes (I think) Is any person out there
> experiencing this problem or I
> >should look harder in the wording and the
> solutions? For example, lab 25
> >says the frame relay subnet of 170.1.100.0/24
> should not be further
> >subnetted. However, the solution creates two
> subnets one between R2 and R4
> >and the second between R2, R5 and R6. Thanks for
> your help.
> >
> >Sam
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:53 GMT-3