From: Nathan Chessin (nchessin@cisco.com)
Date: Mon Nov 04 2002 - 14:45:00 GMT-3
Yes, I think you are right.
I have been playing with this and the dynamic dialer map only comes up with
dialer interfaces. As far as I can tell.
Nate
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaroslaw Zak [mailto:jaroslawz@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:29 AM
> To: nchessin@cisco.com; prashanthcm@yahoo.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Dynamic Dialer Map
>
>
> Nathan,
>
> I dont think Legacy DDR (which is dialer map/dialer string)
> approach will
> work without dialer map. The least you need to provide is
> dialer map with IP
> to remote username mapping so router knows how to bind
> incomming call into
> relevant routing information it has. If i remember correct
> that would give
> you dynamic map entry under "sh dialer map", i might be wrong
> though, have
> done it a while ago.
>
> To get it even simpler I think Dialer interface approach is required.
>
> HTH
> Jarek
>
>
>
> >From: "Nathan Chessin" <nchessin@cisco.com>
> >Reply-To: "Nathan Chessin" <nchessin@cisco.com>
> >To: "'Prashanth'" <prashanthcm@yahoo.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: Dynamic Dialer Map Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 00:25:34 -0800
> >
> >I am trying to have the satellite configured as simply as possible.
> >Without
> >dialer string, without dialer map. This scenario works with dialer
> >profiles, but I haven't gotten it to work without them.
> >
> >
> >Nate
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Prashanth [mailto:prashanthcm@yahoo.com]
> > > Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 5:16 PM
> > > To: Nathan Chessin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: Dynamic Dialer Map
> > >
> > >
> > > Nathan
> > >
> > > a dialer string can be configured instead of the
> > > static dialer map?
> > >
> > > prashanth
> > > --- Nathan Chessin <nchessin@cisco.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > When using ppp encapsulation on both sides of the
> > > > DDR link, it says that I
> > > > should only need a dialer map ip x.x.x.x broadcast
> > > > <string> on one side of
> > > > the link and the other side doesn't need a string or
> > > > dialer map statement.
> > > > However, when testing, I was unable to make the
> > > > call.
> > > >
> > > > At the other end, the show dialer map command
> > > > doesn't reveal any mapping.
> > > > When I add the static dialer map, the call is
> > > > completed and works. Question
> > > > is, why doesn't any dynamic mapping take place.
> > > > Isn't this necessary for
> > > > scenarios not wanting one end of a link to initiate
> > > > the call?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nate
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
> > > http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now!
> http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:52 GMT-3