RE: Heeelp!! Urgent !! CCIE question about CQ

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sun Nov 03 2002 - 11:41:49 GMT-3


If you are going to use CBWFQ, don't forget that by default you only are
allowed to allocate 75% of an interfaces bandwidth!!! So on your
interface, you'll also need "max-reserved-bandwidth 100".

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
csc david
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Ayman Hamza
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Heeelp!! Urgent !! CCIE question about CQ

I think :
 class-map dlswtraffic
  match input-interface ethernet 0
 match access-group "dlsw traffic access-list"
policy-map dlsw50percent
  class dlswtraffic
  bandwidth percent 50
 
  Ayman Hamza <ayhamza@cisco.com> 5DU}ND#: Team;

Sorry for that high urgency. I have a question from a CCIE LAB exam
which saying - exact wording - :

-----------------------------------------------------------------

On a router that you have DLSw+ config , configure CQ such that the
DLSw+ traffic coming from ethernet interfaces to be allocated 50% of the
outbound interface over which the DLSw+ session will be established.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

I don't really how to resolve this! If I configured queue-list for the
traffic coming from ethernet interface that SNA/Netbios staions are
setting, How I can specify in the queue-list command a definition that
associates the DLSw+traffic and incoming interface traffic at teh
sametime ???!

I mean:

queue-list 1 interface ethernet0 1

There is nothing in the above command that let me associates the traffic
coming from ethernet0 with DLSW+, the above command gives a defintion
for all the traffic coming from ethrnet 0 whether it's DLSw+ related or
not! How I can solve this. More over, How I can specify the correct Byte
counts!!!!!

Appreciating any reply!

Regards;
Ayman

---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
"JGIT>+S"Bp#?P!JTE#56;qJ1IP4s=1#!"



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:22:51 GMT-3