From: William Wong Kun Sing (wong_kunsing@solsis-eso.com.my)
Date: Wed Oct 30 2002 - 03:07:22 GMT-3
Shailen
I would advertise that network in other igp. If you are allowed only
advertise in ospf with the condition like no network type is allowed, then
I'll redistribute it into ospf and summarised it to /24 to fix the vlsm --->
flsm issue.
Best regards,
William
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shailen Amichand [SMTP:shailen.amichand@xtra.co.nz]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:35 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Advertising Loopback interfaces in OSPF
>
> Hi Folks
>
> This must have been asked before but I just can't find the post.
>
> Question is, in OSPF Loopback interfaces are advertised as host routes.
> Now you can change this by using the ospf network type point-to-point
> statement.
>
> What I need to know is. What is the best practice if you are NOT asked
> to do this and are there any requirements that would cause you to change
> the way the route is advertised.
>
> Any help with this will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Shailen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:59 GMT-3