From: enginedrive2002 (enginedrive2002@yahoo.ca)
Date: Tue Oct 29 2002 - 17:38:13 GMT-3
Thanks, Sam!
1. Will there has a grey area, that could use either one of them?
2. I know the policy will affect incoming packets, could you give me a
example of how to apply the policy on outgoing packets?
3. Issue "ping" command on route, the resulted traffic should be considered
traffic originated by router or traffic pass through the router?
Thanks!
E.D.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de>
To: <enginedrive2002@yahoo.ca>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: October 29, 2002 3:12 PM
Subject: RE: policy routing.
> The ip local policy route-map will apply the policy to the local traffic
> that is originated by router. While ip policy route-map is applied to the
> traffic leaving or entering the interface, depends on the configuration.
>
> Sam
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: enginedrive2002 [mailto:enginedrive2002@yahoo.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:02 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: policy routing.
>
>
> "ip local policy route-map <map_tag>" is a global configuration command,
> while "ip policy route-map <map_tag>" is a interface configuration
command.
> What's the difference between these two commands?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> E.D.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:59 GMT-3