From: Andre Teku (andre.teku@csosa.gov)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 15:36:57 GMT-3
By the way, the more I look at the original config submitted, the more I
feel uncomfortable with the IP addressing/routing involved. (ip subnet
10.2.1.0/24 is different from 10.1.1.0/24 - and no routing protocol
enabled). If the trunk from the 3550's FastEthernet0/14 is connecting to
the IRB Router at interface FastEthernet0/0 and carrying vlans
10,20,30,1002-1005, then (1) all layers 3 addresses need to be removed from
the sub interfaces participating in the BVI, (2) the BVI interface created
and assigned one IP subnet - 10.1.1.0/24 and (3) an IP routing protocol such
as RIP enabled for routing between the # ip segments and (4) IP specified as
routed out of bridge 1.
Try it again.
Andre
-----Original Message-----
From: mize [mailto:mize@netbuddy.org]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:00 PM
To: Andre Teku
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: RE: some problem w IRB and cat3550 - Follow up
I think it is a bad idea to bridge between vlans. Since cisco switches
running PVST+, the two STP instance will be merged. STP is troublesome.
How about this configuration? (sorry I can't test it right now)
interface FastEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.10
encapsulation isl 10
ip address 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.20
encapsulation isl 20
no ip redirects
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.30
encapsulation isl 30
no ip redirects
bridge-group 1
interface BVI1
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
( bridge 1 protocol ieee REMOVED!#)
bridge 1 route ip
>Have you guys tried to change to bridge protocol from ieee to
"vlan-bridge"?
>That is "bridge 1 protocol vlan-bridge"
>
>Andre
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chris Cole [mailto:CCole@EPLUS.com]
>Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:02 AM
>To: 'hoon'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>Subject: RE: some problem w IRB and cat3550
>
>
>Hoon, I have had the some problem. I heard that it is a bug.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: hoon [mailto:urlee21@kornet.net]
>Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 1:19 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: some problem w IRB and cat3550
>
>
>Group, can anybody explain to me why this 'Intergrated routing & bridging"
>does not work out for me?
>The problem was that I could ping each switch (10.1.1.3) and vlan30 router
>(10.1.1.2) from IRB router(10.1.1.1); arp was shown correctly. But this
>switch and vlan30router could not ping each other at all.
>
>
>cat 3550 config.
>
>interface FastEthernet0/14
> switchport trunk encapsulation isl
> switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,30,1002-1005
> switchport mode trunk
> no ip address
>
>interface FastEthernet0/1
> switchport access vlan 10
> switchport mode access
> no ip address
>
>interface FastEthernet0/2
> switchport access vlan 30
> switchport mode access
> no ip address
>
>nterface Vlan20
> ip address 10.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
>!
>ip default-gateway 10.1.1.1
>
>
>IRB router config
>
>bridge irb
>
>interface FastEthernet0/0
> no ip address
> duplex auto
> speed auto
>!
>interface FastEthernet0/0.10
> encapsulation isl 10
> ip address 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.0
> no ip redirects
>!
>interface FastEthernet0/0.20
> encapsulation isl 20
> no ip redirects
> bridge-group 1
>!
>interface FastEthernet0/0.30
> encapsulation isl 30
> no ip redirects
> bridge-group 1
>
>interface BVI1
> ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>
>bridge 1 protocol ieee
> bridge 1 route ip
>
>
>Vlan 30 router config
>
>interface e0
>ip addresss 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
>
>I've been working this one for whole day, rebooting those devices heaps.
>FYI, this is a WS-C3550-24-SMI switch
>regards,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:58 GMT-3