From: haluk (haluk@sprint.ca)
Date: Fri Oct 25 2002 - 15:22:50 GMT-3
Actually, The cost configured on the dlsw remote peer command overrides any
cost value learned from another devices dlsw local peer command.
check the web site
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls3_rg.htm
Haluk
----- Original Message -----
From: "Diment, Andrew" <adiment@qwest.com>
To: "'Ahmed Mamoor Amimi'" <mamoor@ieee.org>; "chenyan"
<chenyan@deeptht.com.cn>; "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:25 AM
Subject: RE: dlsw cost
> I noticed this too. So what would be the point of ever doing a remote
cost
> if the local cost is going to override it?
>
> Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi [mailto:mamoor@ieee.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:21 AM
> To: chenyan; ccielab
> Subject: Re: dlsw cost
>
>
> Oh yes... there are 2 type of cost "remote" and "local". Remember that
local
> will override the remote. default cost is 3. try altering the local cost
and
> u will see the result that it will prefer the lowest.
>
> -Mamoor
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "chenyan" <chenyan@deeptht.com.cn>
> To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 4:18 PM
> Subject: dlsw cost
>
>
> > hi,guys
> >
> > When I use the cost to select the peers for the circuits, it seemed that
> the cost is not effective, I believe that there is something wrong for my
> test in which I used the netbios ,can anybody tell me how to practise
using
> netbios.
> >
> > Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:57 GMT-3