RE: What's the policy on hardware failures?

From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Mon Oct 21 2002 - 11:30:15 GMT-3

• Next message: Howard C. Berkowitz: "OSPF & ISIS contrasts (was: OSPF DR/BDR Election)"
• Previous message: Peter: "Re: address-family"
• Maybe in reply to: Howard C. Berkowitz: "What's the policy on hardware failures?"
• Next in thread: Rah Hussain: "RE: What's the policy on hardware failures?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 10:40 AM +0100 10/21/02, Rah Hussain wrote:
>Howard,
>
>LOL
>
>I thinks u have been watching way too much Monty Python or John Cleese must
>now be working as a Cisco proctor.
>
>-Rah

Is there such a thing as too much Monty Python, given
network-relevant observations such as the most important machine in
the hospital goes ping?

What's wrong with John Cleese as a proctor?

Is it true there will be a new CCIE test center in Notlob?

And when it comes to determining the velocity of different kinds of
sparrows, I point to the IETF:

   RFC2549: IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service. D. Waitzman.
     Apr-01-1999. (Updates RFC1149)

• Next message: Howard C. Berkowitz: "OSPF & ISIS contrasts (was: OSPF DR/BDR Election)"
• Previous message: Peter: "Re: address-family"
• Maybe in reply to: Howard C. Berkowitz: "What's the policy on hardware failures?"
• Next in thread: Rah Hussain: "RE: What's the policy on hardware failures?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:52 GMT-3