Re: bgp redunancy

From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Fri Oct 11 2002 - 13:18:36 GMT-3

• Next message: esther: "STP on 3550"
• Previous message: Peter van Oene: "Re: Redundancy needed?"
• Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "bgp redunancy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This is pretty vague.. Can you explain in more detail?

At 02:59 PM 10/11/2002 +0800, chenyan wrote:
>hi,all
>
>One bgp peer connected to two bgp peers for redunancy, they works fine,
>but when the main peer recovered it can not be as a current peer. I need
>a solution like "standby preempt" option in hsrp.
>
>Thanks

• Next message: esther: "STP on 3550"
• Previous message: Peter van Oene: "Re: Redundancy needed?"
• Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "bgp redunancy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:45 GMT-3