Re: DLSW and mac addresses

From: fingham@cox.net
Date: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 19:44:54 GMT-3


 Justin; You are correct. DLSw always uses non-canonical addresses. Addresses used in DLSW filters or in dlsw icanreach statements must be in non-canonical format.

HTH, Fred
>
> From: Justin Cook <Justin.Cook@computerland.co.nz>
> Date: 2002/10/10 Thu PM 04:13:48 EDT
> To: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject: DLSW and mac addresses
>
> I have seen a lot of conflicted labs and posts about mac addresses and DLSW.
> Can anyone clarify the following
>
> - DLSW always using noncananical addresses (Tok to Tok, Eth to Eth
> and Tok to Eth)? This means if asked to set a icanreach macaddress you
> always convert to noncanonical before typing it in?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
> --
> Justin Cook



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:44 GMT-3