From: Donny MATEO (donny.mateo@sg.ca-indosuez.com)
Date: Thu Oct 03 2002 - 11:34:00 GMT-3
missed that one.. ;) should've known that.
Best Regards
Donny
Ayman Hamza
<ayhamza@cisco.co To: esther1616@hanmail.net, donny.mateo@sg.ca-indosuez.com
m> cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com, nobody@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: rip network problem
03-10-2002 21:04
Donny, Esther;
THe ethernet interface ethernet 0/1 is passive in R3 configuration!!!!!
So this is normal no RIP routes is being sent from R3 to R2
-Ayman
> From nobody@groupstudy.com Thu Oct 3 13:59:58 2002
> Subject: Re: rip network problem
> To: "esther" <esther1616@hanmail.net>
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com, nobody@groupstudy.com
> From: "Donny MATEO" <donny.mateo@sg.ca-indosuez.com>
> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:47:12 +0800
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match
> Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
> Reply-To: "Donny MATEO" <donny.mateo@sg.ca-indosuez.com>
>
> Esther,
>
> what version of RIP are you using. If you were using version 1 can you provide us with the ip
> address on each interface.
> I can only see from your debug that r2 is sending one update to r3 and that router 3 received the
> update from r2.
>
> As for the part of r 3 passing the update to router 2 I don't see that.
> I see r3 passing six update routes to interface e0/0 to 150.100.2.254 while router 2 is at
> 150.100.1.4 on interface 0/1, so it didn't pass the update to r2. at least not indicated by the
> debug.
> Do a clear ip route * and see if you can catch the update on r3's e0/1.
>
> cant see anything else other than that. Perhaps others have something to add to that.
>
> Donny
>
>
>
> "esther"
> <esther1616@hanma To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> il.net> cc:
> Sent by: Subject: rip network problem
> nobody@groupstudy
> .com
>
>
> 03-10-2002 19:09
> Please respond to
> "esther"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I enabled RIP and eBGP between R2 and R3.
>
> R1 -- (ospf) -- R2 --- (ether / RIP) --- R3
>
> The several rip and bgp networks are generated using the loopback
> interfaces in the R3. And between R2 and R3, rip and eBGP are configured.
>
> Strange thing, the R2 received the bgp routes from R3 normally.
> but, it doesn't receive the rip routes from R3.
> To check it, I enabled the debug (debug ip rip event) in the R2, and I am
> awared of the R2 doesn't receive the rip update from R3 as belows.
>
> < debug on R2 >
> 01:50:09: RIP: Update queued
> 01:50:09: RIP: Update sent via Ethernet0
> 01:50:38: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via Ethernet0
> (150.100.1.4)
> 01:50:38: RIP: Update contains 1 routes
> 01:50:38: RIP: Update queued
> 01:50:38: RIP: Update sent via Ethernet0
>
> <debug on R3>Rack02-BB#
> 00:24:18: RIP: received v1 update from 150.100.1.4 on Ethernet0/1
> 00:24:18: RIP: Update contains 1 routes
> 00:24:30: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via Ethernet0/0
> (150.100.2.254)
> 00:24:30: RIP: Update contains 6 routes
>
> what's wong with below config and is there any remarkable point?
>
> R3#sh run | be router rip
> router rip
> passive-interface Ethernet0/1
> network 150.100.0.0
> network 192.168.2.0
> network 192.168.3.0
> network 192.168.4.0
> network 192.168.5.0
> !
>
> R2#sh run | be router rip
> router rip
> redistribute ospf 2 metric 5
> network 150.100.0.0
> !
>
> Which case deliver this situation ??
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Esther.
>
>
>
>
>
> [TABLE NOT SHOWN]
>
> [TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][IMAGE]
>
>
>
>
>
> This message is for information purposes only and its content
> should not be construed as an offer, or solicitation of an offer,
> to buy or sell any banking or financial instruments or services
> and no representation or warranty is given in respect of its
> accuracy, completeness or fairness. The material is subject
> to change without notice. You should take your own independent
> tax, legal and other professional advice in respect of the content
> of this message. This message may contain confidential or
> legally privileged material and may not be copied, redistributed
> or published (in whole or in part) without our prior written consent.
> This email may have been intercepted, partially destroyed,
> arrive late, incomplete or contain viruses and no liability is
> accepted by any member of the Credit Agricole Indosuez group
> as a result. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
> please immediately notify the sender and delete this message
> from your computer.
>
This message is for information purposes only and its content
should not be construed as an offer, or solicitation of an offer,
to buy or sell any banking or financial instruments or services
and no representation or warranty is given in respect of its
accuracy, completeness or fairness. The material is subject
to change without notice. You should take your own independent
tax, legal and other professional advice in respect of the content
of this message. This message may contain confidential or
legally privileged material and may not be copied, redistributed
or published (in whole or in part) without our prior written consent.
This email may have been intercepted, partially destroyed,
arrive late, incomplete or contain viruses and no liability is
accepted by any member of the Credit Agricole Indosuez group
as a result. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
please immediately notify the sender and delete this message
from your computer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:38 GMT-3