From: esther (esther1616@hanmail.net)
Date: Thu Oct 03 2002 - 08:09:19 GMT-3
Hi all,
I enabled RIP and eBGP between R2 and R3.
R1 -- (ospf) -- R2 --- (ether / RIP) --- R3
The several rip and bgp networks are generated using the loopback
interfaces in the R3. And between R2 and R3, rip and eBGP are configured.
Strange thing, the R2 received the bgp routes from R3 normally.
but, it doesn't receive the rip routes from R3.
To check it, I enabled the debug (debug ip rip event) in the R2, and I am
awared of the R2 doesn't receive the rip update from R3 as belows.
< debug on R2 >
01:50:09: RIP: Update queued
01:50:09: RIP: Update sent via Ethernet0
01:50:38: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via Ethernet0
(150.100.1.4)
01:50:38: RIP: Update contains 1 routes
01:50:38: RIP: Update queued
01:50:38: RIP: Update sent via Ethernet0
<debug on R3>Rack02-BB#
00:24:18: RIP: received v1 update from 150.100.1.4 on Ethernet0/1
00:24:18: RIP: Update contains 1 routes
00:24:30: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via Ethernet0/0
(150.100.2.254)
00:24:30: RIP: Update contains 6 routes
what's wong with below config and is there any remarkable point?
R3#sh run | be router rip
router rip
passive-interface Ethernet0/1
network 150.100.0.0
network 192.168.2.0
network 192.168.3.0
network 192.168.4.0
network 192.168.5.0
!
R2#sh run | be router rip
router rip
redistribute ospf 2 metric 5
network 150.100.0.0
!
Which case deliver this situation ??
Thanks in advance,
Esther.
[TABLE NOT SHOWN]
[TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][IMAGE]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:37 GMT-3