RE: ISDN DIAL

From: Larson, Chris (CLarson@usaid.gov)
Date: Thu Oct 03 2002 - 09:18:28 GMT-3

• Next message: Nordhoff, Michael G. (US - Hermitage): "test - please delete"
• Previous message: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: OSPF Design"
• Maybe in reply to: Adam Crisp: "ISDN DIAL"
• Next in thread: Joseph Kimmer: "Re: ISDN DIAL"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

no spids? might not be needed with that switch type, but it is the first
thing that caught my eye.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Crisp [SMTP:adam.crisp@totalise.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:29 AM
> To: Ccielab
> Subject: ISDN DIAL
>
> Hi,
>
> Can anybody spot why these routers won't dial eachother.
> (they dial ok, but connection is rejected at L3 by remote router)
>
> Switch type is Basic-net3, so no need for SPID's
>
> Adam
>
>
> !Router1
> !
> isdn switch-type basic-net3
> !
> int Bri0/0
> bandwidth 64
> ip address 192.168.200.1 255.255.255.252
> encapsulation ppp
> dialer map ip 192.168.200.2 222 broadcast
> dialer-group 1
> isdn switch-type basic-net3
> dialer idle-timeout 30
> !
> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
> end
> !
> !Router2
> !
> isdn switch-type basic-net3
> !
> int Bri0/0
> bandwidth 64
> ip address 192.168.200.2 255.255.255.252
> encapsulation ppp
> dialer map ip 192.168.200.1 111 broadcast
> dialer-group 1
> isdn switch-type basic-net3
> dialer idle-timeout 30
> !
> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
> !
> end

• Next message: Nordhoff, Michael G. (US - Hermitage): "test - please delete"
• Previous message: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: OSPF Design"
• Maybe in reply to: Adam Crisp: "ISDN DIAL"
• Next in thread: Joseph Kimmer: "Re: ISDN DIAL"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:37 GMT-3