From: Leo Seto (lseto@us.cnlink.net)
Date: Tue Oct 01 2002 - 22:19:35 GMT-3
I could be wrong,
but shouldn't R5 be seeing the supernet route via BGP? Right now you're
seeing
the more specific subnets via EIGRP. I can't tell why your BGP isn't
working without some show ip bgp on R2, to start with.
Leo Seto
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
CTAlex405c@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 5:44 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Solie Skynet supernet advertizement
r2 is to advertize supernet 128.200.0.0
In r2 I have
router bgp 2001
no synchronization
aggregate-address 128.200.0.0 255.252.0.0 summary-only
In r5 I get:
128.200.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D EX 128.200.1.0 [170/2172416] via 140.100.4.1, 00:00:29, Serial1/0
128.201.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D EX 128.201.1.0 [170/2172416] via 140.100.4.1, 00:00:30, Serial1/0
128.202.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D EX 128.202.1.0 [170/2172416] via 140.100.4.1, 00:00:30, Serial1/0
Why don't I get one 128.200.0.0/14 route?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:36 GMT-3