RE: CB WFQ

From: stephen.paynter@bt.com
Date: Tue Sep 24 2002 - 12:32:54 GMT-3


if you want to divide equally use the priority keyword instead of bandwidth
percent 50.

ie on ethernet priority 5000

if you use bandwidth percent that is classed as minimum, priority is classed
as maximum

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/qos_
r/qrdcmd3.htm#1036072

Stephen Paynter CCIE #10206
Customer Engineer
BT Ignite- Customer Engineering Unit, National Solutions
T: +44 (0)1422 338881 F: +44 (0)1422 316637 M: +44 (0)7974 087949
e-mail: stephen.paynter@bt.com
pp HW A170, PO Box 200(HOM-NZ), London, N18 1ZF
> British Telecommunications plc
> Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
> Registered in England no. 1800000.
> This electronic message contains information from British
Telecommunications plc which may be privileged or confidential. The
information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity
named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information
is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please
notify us by telephone or email (to the numbers or address above)
immediately

-----Original Message-----
From: elping [mailto:elpingu@acedsl.com]
Sent: 24 September 2002 03:18
To: Adam Crisp
Cc: Ccielab
Subject: Re: CB WFQ

my friend
CB-WFQ will not do the trick

i though the same thing a while back ...here is the scoop on CB-WFQ.
this method will only gurantee the allocated bandwithd during congestion
.

now the question says ..
dived traffic exactly .....then CB-WFQ will not do the trick..

try custom queeing ..or CAR

Elping
.

Adam Crisp wrote:

> Hi,
>
> If asked to divide up bandwidth EXACTLY, can I use CB-WFQ, with the
> "bandwidth percent XX" command?
>
> eg
>
> class-map match-all my_class_queue_ip
> match access-group 25
> !
> policy-map my_policy
> class my_class_queue_ip
> bandwidth percent 50
>
> OR does this call for Custom Queuing?
>
> thanks in advance...



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:01 GMT-3