FW: BGP aggregation issue

From: Justin Cook (Justin.Cook@computerland.co.nz)
Date: Wed Sep 18 2002 - 22:56:24 GMT-3

• Next message: certstudy: "Re: what is this mean?"
• Previous message: rich: "Re: MS-CCIE"
• Maybe in reply to: Justin Cook: "BGP aggregation issue"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Sorry I have solved this issue I used the wrong mask it should have been
255.255.252.0 and the nets were
192.168.100.0
192.168.101.0
192.168.102.0
etc

SO I guess this has showed me that even when under no pressure those little
errors can creep up on you

Thanks

--
Justin Cook
-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Cook [mailto:Justin.Cook@Computerland.co.nz] 
Sent: Thursday, 19 September 2002 9:02 a.m.
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: BGP aggregation issue
I have 3 routers A (AS 64600) B (100) and C(700) routes are injected via C
using network command asked to summarise on B allowing 2 routes as they are
but to summarise the last 4 routes as 192.168.100.0/30
 
I used aggregate-address 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.252 
 
Routes are
192.168.100.0,.1,.2,.3,.4,.5 
 
above command should summarise the first 4 addresses but they do not seem to
be doing it is there something I am missing
 
Thanks
 
--
Justin Cook

• Next message: certstudy: "Re: what is this mean?"
• Previous message: rich: "Re: MS-CCIE"
• Maybe in reply to: Justin Cook: "BGP aggregation issue"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:56 GMT-3