From: beda jain (bpjain@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Sep 17 2002 - 16:38:53 GMT-3
Hi,
does Dlsw lite work in frame-relay multipoint interface or not.
Thanks,
Beda
At 10:17 AM 9/17/2002 -0700, Mingzhou Nie wrote:
>donny,
>
>this question has been asked several times in the past. I'm resending
>my personal notes again.
>
>****
>- encapsulation: watch out direct encap and llc2(dlsw lite) encap. both
>reference individual dlci, but the first one needs "pass-thru" option
>at the end and map dlci to dlsw, vs. the latter one doesn't use
>"pass-thru" and map dlci to llc2. direct encap only works on main
>interface. and direct encap doesn't work with backup peer. you can not
>configure ip address in "dlsw local-peer" statement.
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls3_rg.htm
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/idg4/nd2007.htm#xtocid31
>http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg00583.html
>http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200111/msg00784.html
>http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg00945.html
>
>****
>
>
>--- Chris Hugo <chrishugo@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Remote Peer stays the same with both.Just the map statements will
> > differ
> > frame-relay map LLC2 is "DLSW Lite" --Which has local acknowledgment
> > frame-relay map DLSW is Direct Encapsulation--Which does not have
> > local acknowledgment
> > I'm sure others will add to the post. But here is some before I sleep
> > :)
> > chris hugo
> > Donny MATEO wrote: Hi Group,
> >
> > I need help to clarify what is the difference between these two
> > configs for DLSW direct
> > encapsulation :
> >
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 0
> > int s0
> > frame-relay map llc2 131
> >
> > and
> >
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 0 131
> > int s0
> > frame-relay map dlsw 131
> >
> > Solie says to use the latter for a multipoint interface. I tried the
> > latter, but the state seems to
> > stay at disconnect. If I add the statement frame-relay map llc2 131,
> > then it would become connect.
> >
> > Any clue ?
> >
> > tks.
> > Donny
> >
> >
> >
> > This message is for information purposes only and its content
> > should not be construed as an offer, or solicitation of an offer,
> > to buy or sell any banking or financial instruments or services
> > and no representation or warranty is given in respect of its
> > accuracy, completeness or fairness. The material is subject
> > to change without notice. You should take your own independent
> > tax, legal and other professional advice in respect of the content
> > of this message. This message may contain confidential or
> > legally privileged material and may not be copied, redistributed
> > or published (in whole or in part) without our prior written consent.
> > This email may have been intercepted, partially destroyed,
> > arrive late, incomplete or contain viruses and no liability is
> > accepted by any member of the Credit Agricole Indosuez group
> > as a result. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
> > please immediately notify the sender and delete this message
> > from your computer.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
>http://news.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:54 GMT-3