From: Mingzhou Nie (mnie@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Sep 17 2002 - 14:17:24 GMT-3
donny,
this question has been asked several times in the past. I'm resending
my personal notes again.
****
- encapsulation: watch out direct encap and llc2(dlsw lite) encap. both
reference individual dlci, but the first one needs "pass-thru" option
at the end and map dlci to dlsw, vs. the latter one doesn't use
"pass-thru" and map dlci to llc2. direct encap only works on main
interface. and direct encap doesn't work with backup peer. you can not
configure ip address in "dlsw local-peer" statement.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls3_rg.htm
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/idg4/nd2007.htm#xtocid31
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg00583.html
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200111/msg00784.html
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg00945.html
****
--- Chris Hugo <chrishugo@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Remote Peer stays the same with both.Just the map statements will
> differ
> frame-relay map LLC2 is "DLSW Lite" --Which has local acknowledgment
> frame-relay map DLSW is Direct Encapsulation--Which does not have
> local acknowledgment
> I'm sure others will add to the post. But here is some before I sleep
> :)
> chris hugo
> Donny MATEO wrote: Hi Group,
>
> I need help to clarify what is the difference between these two
> configs for DLSW direct
> encapsulation :
>
> dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 0
> int s0
> frame-relay map llc2 131
>
> and
>
> dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 0 131
> int s0
> frame-relay map dlsw 131
>
> Solie says to use the latter for a multipoint interface. I tried the
> latter, but the state seems to
> stay at disconnect. If I add the statement frame-relay map llc2 131,
> then it would become connect.
>
> Any clue ?
>
> tks.
> Donny
>
>
>
> This message is for information purposes only and its content
> should not be construed as an offer, or solicitation of an offer,
> to buy or sell any banking or financial instruments or services
> and no representation or warranty is given in respect of its
> accuracy, completeness or fairness. The material is subject
> to change without notice. You should take your own independent
> tax, legal and other professional advice in respect of the content
> of this message. This message may contain confidential or
> legally privileged material and may not be copied, redistributed
> or published (in whole or in part) without our prior written consent.
> This email may have been intercepted, partially destroyed,
> arrive late, incomplete or contain viruses and no liability is
> accepted by any member of the Credit Agricole Indosuez group
> as a result. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
> please immediately notify the sender and delete this message
> from your computer.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:54 GMT-3