RE: OSPF Demand-Circuit Oddity (How do I keep it quiet)

From: Brian McGahan (brian@cyscoexpert.com)
Date: Mon Sep 16 2002 - 21:01:12 GMT-3


        I hate to be stating the obvious, but are you sure this
adjacency is actually up? OSPF will continue to dial the link unless
adjacency is actually established. Are you doing any OSPF
authentication? Post your complete configs.

Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
Director of Design and Implementation
brian@cyscoexpert.com

CyscoExpert Corporation
Internetwork Consulting & Training
http://www.cyscoexpert.com
Voice: 847.674.3392
Fax: 847.674.2625

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Nick Shah
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:32 PM
> To: Sean; Castelino, Flavian; Frank Maisano; Jim Brown;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: OSPF Demand-Circuit Oddity (How do I keep it quiet)
>
> Sean
>
> I had labbed it up a while ago, and every time the second channel
kicked
> in
> (depending on load-threshold), we had a change in bandwidth, so
'nailing'
> the bandwidth seemed a good idea (we can use b/w or cost to accomplish
> this).
> There was a long thread a while ago, check it out.
>
> However, now that I see that you have done your tests, I would think
that
> it
> would more likely be an IOS issue.
>
> rgds
> Nick
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sean <sean_ccie@yahoo.com.cn>
> To: Nick Shah <nshah@connect.com.au>; Castelino, Flavian
> <Flavian.Castelino@nexinnovations.com>; Frank Maisano
> <FrankM@netarch.com>;
> Jim Brown <Jim.Brown@caselogic.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 6:49 AM
> Subject: Re: OSPF Demand-Circuit Oddity (How do I keep it quiet)
>
>
> > Nick,
> >
> > I doubt about this. In my lab, I did not use "ip ospf cost #" to
specify
> > the cost under bri int, and I used ppp multilink. It keeps quiet w/o
any
> > problem. When I ping through the isdn bri, I can see both bri0:1 and
> bri0:2
> > up, and yet the "show ip ospf int bri 0" still show the cost of 1564
> (for
> > single B channel of 64kbps).
> >
> > I don't think ppp multilink will change ospf cost over bri line
since
> when
> > multilink is enabled and up, a virtual-access interface is
dynamically
> created
> > to bundle the traffic, so the original bri cost is not touched.
> >
> > I suggest Jim do a "debug ip ospf monitor" to see whether there is
any
> change
> > LSA when the isdn line is in active.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sean
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Nick Shah <nshah@connect.com.au> 5DU}ND#:> When using MLPP, a
> change
> in
> > bandwidth (when 2 links come up) is considered
> > > a change in OSPF cost of an interface, hence a change LSA is
> generated.
> What
> > > you need to do in this case is to either nail the bandwidth as 128
or
> > > explicitly specify a cost 9999 (for historic reasons, specify
9999,
> even
> > > though in this case since there are no parallel paths you can
specify
> actual
> > > cost)
> > >
> > > Nick
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Castelino, Flavian" <Flavian.Castelino@nexinnovations.com>
> > > To: "Frank Maisano" <FrankM@netarch.com>; "Jim Brown"
> > > <Jim.Brown@caselogic.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:31 AM
> > > Subject: RE: OSPF Demand-Circuit Oddity (How do I keep it quiet)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Try ospf cost <a high number for ex. 9999> on the BRI
interface...
> > > >
> > > > Flavian
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Frank Maisano [mailto:FrankM@netarch.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:45 PM
> > > > To: 'Jim Brown'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: RE: OSPF Demand-Circuit Oddity (How do I keep it quiet)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you have any other routing protocols being redistributed on
> either
> > > > router?
> > > >
> > > > Did you try reseting the ospf process after applying the
> demand-circuit
> > > > command?
> > > >
> > > > I have run into this problem and I do not recall exactly how I
fixed
> it.
> > > >
> > > > Also see:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/dcprob.html
> > > >
> > > > --Frank
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jim Brown [mailto:Jim.Brown@caselogic.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:01 AM
> > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: OSPF Demand-Circuit Oddity (How do I keep it quiet)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Gang,
> > > >
> > > > I cannot make the demand circuit stay quiet!
> > > >
> > > > I'm probably a little clueless and probably cannot see the
forest
> because
> > > of
> > > > the trees. I configured an ISDN connection between two routers,
R5
> and
> R6.
> > > > It is configured so only R5 can call R6. There aren't any dialer
map
> > > > statements on R6 for it to call if it wanted too.
> > > >
> > > > Packets destined for the OSPF multicast address 224.0.0.5
continue
> to
> > > bring
> > > > the line up after I configure the interface as a demand circuit?
> > > >
> > > > I tried the usual, no peer neighbor route on the interface to
> eliminate
> > > > feedback from an classfull protocol.
> > > >
> > > > I then thought I must be missing something somewhere an began to
> shut
> down
> > > > the interfaces on R5 one by one to eliminate any feedback?
> > > >
> > > > After I shut down every interface except for the BRI, it sill
won't
> stay
> > > > quiet!
> > > >
> > > > What is the deal?
> > > >
> > > > I have attached all of the relevant information below. Any help
or
> clarity
> > > > is greatly appreciated. I'm stumped!!!!!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > IOS Version 12.1.1
> > > >
> > > > r5#show isdn act
> > >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > > --
> > > > ----
> > > > ISDN ACTIVE CALLS
> > >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > > --
> > > > ----
> > > > Call Calling Called Remote Seconds Seconds
Seconds
> Charges
> > > > Type Number Number Name Used Left Idle
> > > > Units/Currency
> > >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > > --
> > > > ----
> > > > Out 5552001 r6 89
0
> 0
> > > > Out 5552001 r6 88
0
> 0
> > >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > > --
> > > > ----
> > > >
> > > > r5#show run interface bri0
> > > > Building configuration...
> > > >
> > > > Current configuration:
> > > > !
> > > > interface BRI0
> > > > ip address 150.10.65.1 255.255.255.252
> > > > encapsulation ppp
> > > > ip ospf demand-circuit
> > > > dialer map ip 150.10.65.2 broadcast 5552001
> > > > dialer load-threshold 1 outbound
> > > > dialer-group 1
> > > > isdn switch-type basic-dms100
> > > > isdn spid1 30355530010101 5553001
> > > > isdn spid2 30355530020101 5553002
> > > > no peer neighbor-route
> > > > ppp authentication chap callin
> > > > ppp chap hostname cisco5
> > > > ppp multilink
> > > > end
> > > >
> > > > r5#show ip interface brief
> > > > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
> > > > Protocol
> > > > BRI0 150.10.65.1 YES NVRAM up
> > > > up
> > > > BRI0:1 unassigned YES unset up
> > > > up
> > > > BRI0:2 unassigned YES unset up
> > > > up
> > > > Ethernet0 150.10.50.5 YES NVRAM
> administratively
> > > down
> > > > down
> > > > Loopback0 150.10.5.5 YES NVRAM
> administratively
> > > down
> > > > down
> > > > Loopback1 200.150.150.5 YES NVRAM
> administratively
> > > down
> > > > down
> > > > Serial0 unassigned YES NVRAM
> administratively
> > > down
> > > > down
> > > > Serial0.1 150.10.60.5 YES NVRAM
> administratively
> > > down
> > > > down
> > > > Serial0.2 150.10.10.5 YES NVRAM
> administratively
> > > down
> > > > down
> > > > Serial0.3 150.10.40.5 YES NVRAM
> administratively
> > > down
> > > > down
> > > > Serial1 unassigned YES NVRAM
> administratively
> > > down
> > > > down
> > > > Virtual-Access1 unassigned YES TFTP up
> > > > up
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 08:46:34: IP: s=150.10.65.1 (local), d=224.0.0.5 (BRI0), len 64,
> sending
> > > > broad/multicast
> > > > 08:46:34: IP: s=150.10.65.1 (local), d=224.0.0.5 (BRI0), len 64,
> > > > encapsulation failed
> > > > 08:46:35: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up
> > > > 08:46:35: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access1, changed
state
> to
> up
> > > > 08:46:35: is_up: 1 state: 4 sub state: 1 line: 0
> > > > 08:46:36: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
BRI0:1,
> changed
> > > > state to up
> > > > 08:46:36: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> Virtual-Access1,
> > > > changed state to up
> > > > 08:46:36: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:2, changed state to up
> > > > 08:46:37: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
BRI0:2,
> changed
> > > > state to up
> > > > 08:46:42: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:2 is now connected to
> 5552001 r6
> > > >
> > > > r5#sh ip ospf int bri0
> > > > BRI0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
> > > > Internet Address 150.10.65.1/30, Area 5
> > > > Process ID 64, Router ID 150.10.65.1, Network Type
POINT_TO_POINT,
> Cost:
> > > > 1562
> > > > Configured as demand circuit.
> > > > Run as demand circuit.
> > > > DoNotAge LSA allowed.
> > > > Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DOWN,
> > > > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40,
Retransmit
> 5
> > > > Hello due in 00:00:26 (using PollInterval of 40)
> > > > r5#
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > PBOJ5=5W,Si@V5=<R - QE;"MF3vCb7QSi@V5gWSV\1(!
> > http://cn.ent.yahoo.com/newsletter/index.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:54 GMT-3