Re: OSPF Demand-Circuit Oddity (How do I keep it quiet)

From: Sean (sean_ccie@yahoo.com.cn)
Date: Mon Sep 16 2002 - 22:53:09 GMT-3


Nick,

See my config below, and a few show command dumps.
I don't think this is a IOS issue.

Thanks,

Sean

******************************************

w2 -- ISDN -- w5,

There are some other routers connected with w2 and w5,
I just skip them.

Both w2 and w5 are in area 0. w2 is 12.1(15.7), w5 is 12.2(6g).

w5#sh run int bri0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 333 bytes
!
interface BRI0
 ip address 192.168.100.2 255.255.255.252
 encapsulation ppp
 ip ospf demand-circuit
 no ip mroute-cache
 dialer idle-timeout 60
 dialer map ip 192.168.100.1 name w2 broadcast 20408
 dialer load-threshold 1 outbound
 dialer-group 1
 isdn switch-type basic-5ess
 ppp authentication chap
 ppp multilink
end

w2#sh run int bri 0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 354 bytes
!
interface BRI0
 ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.252
 encapsulation ppp
 ip ospf demand-circuit
 no ip mroute-cache
 dialer idle-timeout 90
 dialer fast-idle 30
 dialer map ip 192.168.100.2 name w5 broadcast 20508
 dialer load-threshold 1 outbound
 dialer-group 1
 isdn switch-type basic-5ess
 ppp authentication chap
 ppp multilink
end

w2#sh ip ospf neighbor

Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
192.168.254.5 1 FULL/ - - 192.168.100.2 BRI0
192.168.254.3 1 FULL/DROTHER 00:00:38 200.100.100.3 Ethernet0
192.168.254.7 1 FULL/DR 00:00:30 200.100.100.7 Ethernet0

w5#sh ip ospf neighbor

Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
192.168.254.7 1 FULL/ - 00:00:31 192.168.100.129 Serial0
192.168.254.2 1 FULL/ - - 192.168.100.1 BRI0
192.168.254.6 1 FULL/DR 00:00:37 100.100.100.6 Ethernet0

w5#sh ip ospf int bri0
BRI0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
  Internet Address 192.168.100.2/30, Area 0
  Process ID 1, Router ID 192.168.254.5, Network Type POINT_TO_POINT, Cost:
1562
  Configured as demand circuit.
  Run as demand circuit.
  DoNotAge LSA allowed.
  Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT,
  Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
    Hello due in 00:00:04
  Index 1/1, flood queue length 0
  Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
  Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 3
  Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 8 msec
  Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1
    Adjacent with neighbor 192.168.254.2 (Hello suppressed)
  Suppress hello for 1 neighbor(s)

=================================================================
Now after I pinged 192.168.100.2 from w2, I saw the followings:
=================================================================

w5#
1d17h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up
1d17h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access1, changed state to up
Vi1 DDR: Dialer statechange to up
Vi1 DDR: dialer protocol up
1d17h: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0:1, changed state to
up
1d17h: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Virtual-Access1, changed
state to up
1d17h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:2, changed state to up
1d17h: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 20408 w2
1d17h: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0:2, changed state to
up
1d17h: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:2 is now connected to 20408 w2
w5#sh ip ospf int bri0
BRI0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
  Internet Address 192.168.100.2/30, Area 0
  Process ID 1, Router ID 192.168.254.5, Network Type POINT_TO_POINT, Cost:
1562
  Configured as demand circuit.
  Run as demand circuit.
  DoNotAge LSA allowed.
  Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT,
  Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
    Hello due in 00:00:02
  Index 1/1, flood queue length 0
  Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
  Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 3
  Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 8 msec
  Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1
    Adjacent with neighbor 192.168.254.2 (Hello suppressed)
  Suppress hello for 1 neighbor(s)

  ================================================================
  See ospf cost on bri 0 not changes, and interface vi1 is up now
  ================================================================

--- Nick Shah <nshah@connect.com.au> 5DU}ND#:> Sean
>
> I had labbed it up a while ago, and every time the second channel kicked in
> (depending on load-threshold), we had a change in bandwidth, so 'nailing'
> the bandwidth seemed a good idea (we can use b/w or cost to accomplish
> this).
> There was a long thread a while ago, check it out.
>
> However, now that I see that you have done your tests, I would think that it
> would more likely be an IOS issue.
>
> rgds
> Nick
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sean <sean_ccie@yahoo.com.cn>
> To: Nick Shah <nshah@connect.com.au>; Castelino, Flavian
> <Flavian.Castelino@nexinnovations.com>; Frank Maisano <FrankM@netarch.com>;
> Jim Brown <Jim.Brown@caselogic.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 6:49 AM
> Subject: Re: OSPF Demand-Circuit Oddity (How do I keep it quiet)
>
>
> > Nick,
> >
> > I doubt about this. In my lab, I did not use "ip ospf cost #" to specify
> > the cost under bri int, and I used ppp multilink. It keeps quiet w/o any
> > problem. When I ping through the isdn bri, I can see both bri0:1 and
> bri0:2
> > up, and yet the "show ip ospf int bri 0" still show the cost of 1564 (for
> > single B channel of 64kbps).
> >
> > I don't think ppp multilink will change ospf cost over bri line since when
> > multilink is enabled and up, a virtual-access interface is dynamically
> created
> > to bundle the traffic, so the original bri cost is not touched.
> >
> > I suggest Jim do a "debug ip ospf monitor" to see whether there is any
> change
> > LSA when the isdn line is in active.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sean
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Nick Shah <nshah@connect.com.au> 5DU}ND#:> When using MLPP, a change
> in
> > bandwidth (when 2 links come up) is considered
> > > a change in OSPF cost of an interface, hence a change LSA is generated.
> What
> > > you need to do in this case is to either nail the bandwidth as 128 or
> > > explicitly specify a cost 9999 (for historic reasons, specify 9999, even
> > > though in this case since there are no parallel paths you can specify
> actual
> > > cost)
> > >
> > > Nick



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:54 GMT-3