From: Omer Ansari (omer@ansari.com)
Date: Wed Sep 11 2002 - 21:00:53 GMT-3
Steve,
> Also check you don't have the peer on demand defaults changed from the
> default (TCP), if you do ensure that you have the same protocol on the other
> end using the prom peer-defaults command. E.g if you wanted to use FST for
> POD instead of TCP you would have peer-on-demand defaults FST on the
> receiving end and prom peer-defaults FST on the other.
shouldn't it be the other way around? meaning
prom peer-defaults fst on the receiving end, and
peer-on-demand defaults fst on the initiating end?
> Steve
> #10055
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ping pong [mailto:pong964815@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 11 September 2002 07:18
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Dlsw border , peer groups
>
>
> Hello group,
> I have tried to configure peer groups and border peers in dlsw. For
> instance I would configure 2 groups (30 and 40) and in each group have two
> routers. The border peer in each peer group would peer with the other border
>
> peer and be set on promiscuous. The non border peers in the group would have
>
> a connection to the border peers of their group and be set on promiscuious.
> The non border peers do peer with the border peers of their group and the
> border peers also peer with the opposite border router and their non-border
> peer in their group.
> -====The problem is that I can never get the non-border peers to do a peer
> on demand with each other.-==== Does traffic need to be passing between the
> groups for a pod to be established? I also tried setting icanreach on each
> router and still the pod's never activate. Any help would be appreciated.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:49 GMT-3