From: Angelo De Guzman (ghie_pogi@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Sep 11 2002 - 23:43:21 GMT-3
Thanks to all! I was able to make it work with
policy routing.
In this lab the ff. needs to be satisfied
1. dont use the ip ospf network command
2. Solve the problem via layer 3
Is there any other way to solve this problem other
than policy routing?
Many Thanks,
Angelo De Guzman
--- Jason Sinclair <sinclairj@powertel.com.au> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> I agree - and unless the lab specifically calls for
> it why would you expend
> the effort. I know the lab is based on "non real
> world" scenarios, however I
> do advocate sticking to what we would do in the
> "real world" where possible.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jason Sinclair CCIE #9100
> Manager, Network Control Centre
> POWERTEL
> 55 Clarence Street,
> SYDNEY NSW 2000
> AUSTRALIA
> office: + 61 2 8264 3820
> mobile: + 61 416 105 858
> email: sinclairj@powertel.com.au
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter van Oene [mailto:pvo@usermail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 12 September 2002 03:03
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: OSPF and NBMA
>
> Thanks Edward.
>
> I did understand his point but don't think he
> understood mine. I was
> simply suggesting that point to point sub-interfaces
> would be a better way
> to deal with topology. I'm not a big fan of kludges
> like policy routing.
>
> At 10:59 AM 9/11/2002 -0600, Edward Monk wrote:
> >Peter,
> >
> >Policy routing
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >McClure, Allen
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:41 AM
> >To: Peter van Oene; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: OSPF and NBMA
> >
> >Via layer3? Sounds like a route-map.
> >
> >Allen McClure
> >MCSE, CCNP, CCDP
> >YUM! Brands, Inc.
> >Sr. Network Analyst
> >NEW E-Mail - mailto:allen.mcclure@yum.com
> >972-338-7494
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Peter van Oene [mailto:pvo@usermail.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:55 PM
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: OSPF and NBMA
> >
> >
> >point to point sub interfaces come to mind.
> >
> >At 06:29 PM 9/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> > >To All,
> > >
> > > R1 R2 R3 R4 ---- R6
> > > \ \ / /
> > > \ \ / /
> > > \ \ / /
> > > R5
> > >
> > > This is a Hub and spoke topology. Wanted to
> have reachability to all
> >
> > >network. Frame-relay cloud is in area 0. R1 has
> another area w/c is 1
> > >and R2 has 2 and so on. I don't want to use
> frame-relay map to reach
> > >the other spokes. I need to solve this problem
> via
> > >Layer 3.
> > >Any ideas?
> > >Thanks,
> > >Angelo De Guzman
> > >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> > >Yahoo! - We Remember
> > >9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
> > >http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute
> >This communication is confidential and may be
> legally privileged. If
> >you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do
> not read or disclose
> >to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply
> mail, and (iii) please
> >delete this communication from your system.
> Failure to follow this
> >process may be unlawful. Thank you for your
> cooperation.
>
**********************************************************************
> PowerTel Limited, winners of
> Broadband Wholesale Carrier of the year, CommsWorld
> Telecomms Awards 2001
> Best Emerging Telco, Australian Telecom Awards 2001
>
>
**********************************************************************
> This email (including all attachments) is intended
> solely for the named
> addressee. It is confidential and may contain
> commercially sensitive
> information. If you receive it in error, please let
> us know by reply email,
> delete it from your system and destroy any copies.
>
> This email is also subject to copyright. No part of
> it should be reproduced,
> adapted or transmitted without the prior written
> consent of the copyright owner.
>
> Emails may be interfered with, may contain computer
> viruses or other defects
> and may not be successfully replicated on other
> systems. We give no
> warranties in relation to these matters. If you have
> any doubts about
> the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by us,
> please contact us
> immediately.
>
>
**********************************************************************
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:49 GMT-3