From: Nick Shah (nshah@connect.com.au)
Date: Thu Sep 12 2002 - 00:18:35 GMT-3
you could use tunnels .. I am positive that a p2p tunnel (the number of
tunnels will depend on number of spokes) will work. But a P2MP tunnel (not
tried) should also work.. Try it out if you have time :)
Now the question arises as to whether the 'tunnel solution' is a L3 solution
or a L2 solution :)
Enjoy
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Angelo De Guzman" <ghie_pogi@yahoo.com>
To: "Jason Sinclair" <sinclairj@powertel.com.au>; "'Peter van Oene'"
<pvo@usermail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:43 PM
Subject: RE: OSPF and NBMA
> Thanks to all! I was able to make it work with
> policy routing.
>
> In this lab the ff. needs to be satisfied
> 1. dont use the ip ospf network command
> 2. Solve the problem via layer 3
>
> Is there any other way to solve this problem other
> than policy routing?
>
> Many Thanks,
> Angelo De Guzman
>
>
> --- Jason Sinclair <sinclairj@powertel.com.au> wrote:
> > Peter,
> >
> > I agree - and unless the lab specifically calls for
> > it why would you expend
> > the effort. I know the lab is based on "non real
> > world" scenarios, however I
> > do advocate sticking to what we would do in the
> > "real world" where possible.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jason Sinclair CCIE #9100
> > Manager, Network Control Centre
> > POWERTEL
> > 55 Clarence Street,
> > SYDNEY NSW 2000
> > AUSTRALIA
> > office: + 61 2 8264 3820
> > mobile: + 61 416 105 858
> > email: sinclairj@powertel.com.au
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter van Oene [mailto:pvo@usermail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, 12 September 2002 03:03
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: OSPF and NBMA
> >
> > Thanks Edward.
> >
> > I did understand his point but don't think he
> > understood mine. I was
> > simply suggesting that point to point sub-interfaces
> > would be a better way
> > to deal with topology. I'm not a big fan of kludges
> > like policy routing.
> >
> > At 10:59 AM 9/11/2002 -0600, Edward Monk wrote:
> > >Peter,
> > >
> > >Policy routing
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > >McClure, Allen
> > >Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:41 AM
> > >To: Peter van Oene; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: RE: OSPF and NBMA
> > >
> > >Via layer3? Sounds like a route-map.
> > >
> > >Allen McClure
> > >MCSE, CCNP, CCDP
> > >YUM! Brands, Inc.
> > >Sr. Network Analyst
> > >NEW E-Mail - mailto:allen.mcclure@yum.com
> > >972-338-7494
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Peter van Oene [mailto:pvo@usermail.com]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:55 PM
> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: Re: OSPF and NBMA
> > >
> > >
> > >point to point sub interfaces come to mind.
> > >
> > >At 06:29 PM 9/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> > > >To All,
> > > >
> > > > R1 R2 R3 R4 ---- R6
> > > > \ \ / /
> > > > \ \ / /
> > > > \ \ / /
> > > > R5
> > > >
> > > > This is a Hub and spoke topology. Wanted to
> > have reachability to all
> > >
> > > >network. Frame-relay cloud is in area 0. R1 has
> > another area w/c is 1
> > > >and R2 has 2 and so on. I don't want to use
> > frame-relay map to reach
> > > >the other spokes. I need to solve this problem
> > via
> > > >Layer 3.
> > > >Any ideas?
> > > >Thanks,
> > > >Angelo De Guzman
> > > >
> > >
> > >__________________________________________________
> > > >Yahoo! - We Remember
> > > >9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
> > > >http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute
> > >This communication is confidential and may be
> > legally privileged. If
> > >you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do
> > not read or disclose
> > >to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply
> > mail, and (iii) please
> > >delete this communication from your system.
> > Failure to follow this
> > >process may be unlawful. Thank you for your
> > cooperation.
> >
> **********************************************************************
> > PowerTel Limited, winners of
> > Broadband Wholesale Carrier of the year, CommsWorld
> > Telecomms Awards 2001
> > Best Emerging Telco, Australian Telecom Awards 2001
> >
> >
> **********************************************************************
> > This email (including all attachments) is intended
> > solely for the named
> > addressee. It is confidential and may contain
> > commercially sensitive
> > information. If you receive it in error, please let
> > us know by reply email,
> > delete it from your system and destroy any copies.
> >
> > This email is also subject to copyright. No part of
> > it should be reproduced,
> > adapted or transmitted without the prior written
> > consent of the copyright owner.
> >
> > Emails may be interfered with, may contain computer
> > viruses or other defects
> > and may not be successfully replicated on other
> > systems. We give no
> > warranties in relation to these matters. If you have
> > any doubts about
> > the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by us,
> > please contact us
> > immediately.
> >
> >
> **********************************************************************
> >
> __________________________________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message
> > to
> > majordomo@groupstudy.com with the body containing:
> > unsubscribe ccielab
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
> http://autos.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:49 GMT-3