From: Tom Larus (tlarus@cox.net)
Date: Sat Sep 07 2002 - 11:02:34 GMT-3
The 100 cost is the cost that is being advertised by 2.2.2.2. On your
router where you are looking at the routing table (1.1.1.1), the cost of the
link between this router and 2.2.2.2 (64) has been added to the 100.
This is exactly the way things should work with type 1 LSAs.
Best wishes,
Tom Larus
-- Original Message -----
From: "Hunt Lee" <ciscoforme3@yahoo.com.au>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 4:23 AM
Subject: Redistributation problem
> Hello:
>
> Today, I was half way on doing a scenario, and one of the tasks require
> me to redistribute EIGRP routes into OSPF, via both External Type 1 &
> Type 2. All Type 1 routes have been assigned with a cost of 100, while
> 200 for all Type 2 routes.
>
> router ospf 2
> log-adjacency-changes
> redistribute eigrp 10 metric 66 subnets tag 555 route-map haha
> network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 0
> network 199.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 7
>
> route-map haha permit 10
> match ip address 1
> set metric 200
> set tag 1
> !
> route-map haha permit 20
> set metric 100
> set metric-type type-1
> set tag 2
>
>
> One funny thing is that on the one of the internal routers, I noticed
> that the OSPF cost for the E1 routes has changed to 164, but on it's
> OSPF database, the metric stays as 100!!! Is this correct? I would
> assume that both of them would be 164, or 100??? Any help ? I am a
> rookie.
>
>
> RouterA#sh ip route
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B -BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS
> inter area
> * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> P - periodic downloaded static route
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> C 1.1.1.1 is directly connected, Loopback0
> 2.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O 2.2.2.2 [110/65] via 10.1.1.2, 02:06:32, Serial0
> O E1 205.5.5.0/24 [110/164] via 10.1.1.2, 02:06:32, Serial0
> 206.6.6.0/28 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O E2 206.6.6.0 [110/200] via 10.1.1.2, 02:06:32, Serial0
> O E1 5.0.0.0/8 [110/164] via 10.1.1.2, 02:06:32, Serial0
> 6.0.0.0/12 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O E2 6.0.0.0 [110/200] via 10.1.1.2, 02:06:32, Serial0
> O E1 145.5.0.0/16 [110/164] via 10.1.1.2, 02:06:33, Serial0
> 199.1.1.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O IA 199.1.1.1 [110/65] via 10.1.1.2, 02:06:33, Serial0
> 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
> C 10.1.1.8/30 is directly connected, Serial1
> C 10.1.1.0/30 is directly connected, Serial0
> O E2 10.1.1.4/30 [110/200] via 10.1.1.2, 02:06:33, Serial0
> C 10.199.25.0/28 is directly connected, Loopback6
> 146.6.0.0/20 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O E2 146.6.0.0 [110/200] via 10.1.1.2, 02:06:33, Serial0
>
>
> As for the OSPF database, the metric stays as 100!!!
>
>
> RouterA#sh ip ospf database external
>
> OSPF Router with ID (1.1.1.1) (Process ID 1)
>
> Type-5 AS External Link States
>
> Routing Bit Set on this LSA
> LS age: 1876
> Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
> LS Type: AS External Link
> Link State ID: 5.0.0.0 (External Network Number )
> Advertising Router: 2.2.2.2
> LS Seq Number: 80000005
> Checksum: 0x2697
> Length: 36
> Network Mask: /8
> Metric Type: 1 (Comparable directly to link state metric)
> TOS: 0
> Metric: 100
> Forward Address: 0.0.0.0
> External Route Tag: 2
>
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> Hunt Lee
>
> http://mobile.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger for SMS
> - Now send & receive IMs on your mobile via SMS
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:46 GMT-3