RE: single point of redistribution

From: ccie candidate (ccie1@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Aug 25 2002 - 16:01:51 GMT-3


   
 i agree on your point and it is my strategy as well ..however it is better to
understand why we do things ...the question is why it is really needed (where s
ome of the books they said for single point of redistrubtions ..you dont have t
o worry about filters ) ...if i dont have to worry then i can also save time ..
right ?

--

On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 13:52:20 Michael Snyder wrote: >Be a control freak, yes, in general use tags and filters. > >Think of it this way, how much time is it going to take to figure out >that you don't need to use them? > >How much time is it going to use them, considering that you need the >practice anyway? The more you do, the faster you'll get. > >What if you do need them, and you thought you didn't? > >That will cost you big time. > >In a nutshell, be a control freak. > >Lock down anything you can, inverse arp, split horizon, dialer maps, >etc. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of >ccie candidate >Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 1:20 PM >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject: single point of redistribution > >guys ; > >when we have single point of redistribution ..is there any need for >filters ?? and why or in which cases this is necessary > > >thanks > >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:37 GMT-3