CyscoExpert EIGRP Section F Inconsistency?

From: Michael Snyder (msnyder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Aug 24 2002 - 10:37:36 GMT-3


   
Unless I'm misreading the lab, there's seems to be a problem in the BGP
section. F.4.3 seems to imply a connection between AS34 and AS256,
While section F.2 has no such neighbor relationship.

Please Advise,

Michael

----------------------------------------------------

F.2

R1(AS1) should peer with R2(AS256) and R4(AS34)
R4(AS34) should peer with R2(AS256) and R3(AS34)
R6(AS256) should peer with R2(AS256) and R5(AS256)

This would diagram out as a half circle.

R5(256)-R6(256)-R2(256)-R1(1)-R4(34)-R3(34)

F.4

3. AS34 should route through AS256 to get R1's Loopback.
This configuration should be done on R1.

4. AS 256 should route thought AS 1 to get to R3 Loopback



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:36 GMT-3