RE: order in sh ip route

From: ccie candidate (ccie1@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 20 2002 - 09:05:47 GMT-3

• Next message: ccie candidate: "RE: ACL to block /29 route?"
• Previous message: Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE): "RE: Are EIGRP external routes preferable than OSPF ext ??"
• Maybe in reply to: Luis Miguel Gil: "order in sh ip route"
• Next in thread: Brian Dennis: "RE: order in sh ip route"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
good question :)))

unfortunetaly you can not translate that to "sorted lookup "

lol

--
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:08:47
 Luis Miguel Gil wrote:
>and what is a "efficient lookup" ?
>
>thanks,
>Luis Miguel.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Colin Barber [mailto:Colin.Barber@telewest.co.uk]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 9:49 AM
>To: 'Luis Miguel Gil'
>Subject: RE: order in sh ip route
>
>
>It's meant to be the way the IOS has ordered the table to provide the most
>efficient lookups. I wish you could have a numerical ordered display, I use
>show ip cef if I need that.
>
>Colin.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Luis Miguel Gil [mailto:lmgil@intecno.net]
>Sent: 20 August 2002 08:20
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: order in sh ip route
>
>
>Hi all,
>just curious, but I think it is quite important.
>When you have a complex topology, the routing table is quite big.
>Does anyboy know how the routes in the routing table are displayed when you
>do a sh ip route ?
>
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Luis Miguel.

• Next message: ccie candidate: "RE: ACL to block /29 route?"
• Previous message: Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE): "RE: Are EIGRP external routes preferable than OSPF ext ??"
• Maybe in reply to: Luis Miguel Gil: "order in sh ip route"
• Next in thread: Brian Dennis: "RE: order in sh ip route"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:30 GMT-3