RE: Tagging routes

From: Colin Barber (Colin.Barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Aug 18 2002 - 06:18:30 GMT-3


   
The word 'understands' tags is a bit misleading. The routing protocols do
not look at or use this tag they merely transfer the field from one to
another.

OSPF and EIGRP support 32-bit field but RIPv2 only has a 16-bit field.
Therefore remember to keep tags below 65535 if you are using RIP.

Colin

-----Original Message-----
From: ccie candidate [mailto:ccie1@lycos.com]
Sent: 18 August 2002 05:38
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Jon O'Nan
Subject: Re: Tagging routes

As per doyle's vol1 , only RIPv1 and IGRP do NOT understand tags .
so you can do this solution in the two directions like that

route-map ospf2eigrp deny 10
match tag 88
!
route-map ospf2eigrp permit 20
set tag 77
!

do the opposite for Eigrpp .

HTH

--

On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 17:18:20 Jon O'Nan wrote: >I am doing mutual redistribution between ospf and eigrp on a single router. >Does eigrp understand the tag attribute when redistributing from ospf? And >should I also use a distribute list for incoming routes in ospf? > >Thanks >Jon > >router ospf 100 > log-adjacency-changes > redistribute eigrp 10 metric-type 1 subnets tag 10 > network 10.1.10.1 0.0.0.0 area 51 > network 172.32.10.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 > >router eigrp 10 > redistribute ospf 100 route-map tag > network 10.1.20.0 0.0.0.255 > network 172.30.1.0 0.0.0.255 > default-metric 2000 100 255 1 1500 > no auto-summary > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes > >route-map tag deny 10 > match tag 10 >! >route-map tag permit 20



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:28 GMT-3