From: certstudy (certstudy@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:55:49 GMT-3
how about Massachusetts? They have a huge presence there and had announced
a new large facility near Cambridge a couple of years ago
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/146/pressroom/2000/jan00/corp_011800.htm
----- Original Message -----
From: <arousch@yahoo.com>
To: "Jim Brown" <Jim.Brown@caselogic.com>; "'Steve Router'"
<route2hell@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:53 PM
Subject: RE: CCIE LAB IN NY (It will never happen?)
> NY would never happen. Denver is more of a possibility. It's not a
matter
> of WHERE the lab is in relation to the people taking it. It's a matter of
> the Cisco facility in the area. I.e. SJC is HQ with TAC, RTP is a very
> large campus with TAC, Dallas has a large campus with TAC, etc. I would
> imagine Cisco only has sales offices in NY.
>
> At 03:39 PM 8/14/2002, Jim Brown wrote:
> >I heard a while ago, Denver was slated as the next lab site? This might
only
> >be a rumor. I also heard the canned the idea when everything went South.
> >
> >Denver would make sense though. It is approximately half-way between the
> >other two sites and in the middle of the country.
> >
> >As far as the backlog is concerned, Cisco changed to the one day format
from
> >the two day format and fixed the backlog problem, right? Look how much
> >shorter the backlog is! ;-)
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Steve Router [mailto:route2hell@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:14 PM
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: CCIE LAB IN NY (It will never happen?)
> >
> >
> >What would it take for CISCO to open a lab in NY area ? OR in any other
> >locations with a waiting list out the door there was to be a better way
to
> >test in more then 2 sites in the us..????
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:27 GMT-3