From: arousch@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu Aug 15 2002 - 23:10:19 GMT-3
A couple of years ago the economy wasn't a big pile of steaming dog sh**
either.
At 08:55 PM 8/15/2002, certstudy wrote:
>how about Massachusetts? They have a huge presence there and had announced
>a new large facility near Cambridge a couple of years ago
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/146/pressroom/2000/jan00/corp_011800.htm
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <arousch@yahoo.com>
>To: "Jim Brown" <Jim.Brown@caselogic.com>; "'Steve Router'"
><route2hell@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:53 PM
>Subject: RE: CCIE LAB IN NY (It will never happen?)
>
>
> > NY would never happen. Denver is more of a possibility. It's not a
>matter
> > of WHERE the lab is in relation to the people taking it. It's a matter of
> > the Cisco facility in the area. I.e. SJC is HQ with TAC, RTP is a very
> > large campus with TAC, Dallas has a large campus with TAC, etc. I would
> > imagine Cisco only has sales offices in NY.
> >
> > At 03:39 PM 8/14/2002, Jim Brown wrote:
> > >I heard a while ago, Denver was slated as the next lab site? This might
>only
> > >be a rumor. I also heard the canned the idea when everything went South.
> > >
> > >Denver would make sense though. It is approximately half-way between the
> > >other two sites and in the middle of the country.
> > >
> > >As far as the backlog is concerned, Cisco changed to the one day format
>from
> > >the two day format and fixed the backlog problem, right? Look how much
> > >shorter the backlog is! ;-)
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Steve Router [mailto:route2hell@hotmail.com]
> > >Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:14 PM
> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: CCIE LAB IN NY (It will never happen?)
> > >
> > >
> > >What would it take for CISCO to open a lab in NY area ? OR in any other
> > >locations with a waiting list out the door there was to be a better way
>to
> > >test in more then 2 sites in the us..????
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:27 GMT-3