From: Chuck Church (cchurch@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 15 2002 - 00:46:47 GMT-3
I know Cisco's building a large campus in Massachusetts, somewhere near
Clinton, which is about 40 miles west of Boston. Only a couple hour drive
from NYC. But Raleigh is so nice in January...
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Sr. Network Engineer
Magnacom Technologies
140 N. Rt. 303
Valley Cottage, NY 10989
845-267-4000
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
arousch@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:54 PM
To: Jim Brown; 'Steve Router'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: CCIE LAB IN NY (It will never happen?)
NY would never happen. Denver is more of a possibility. It's not a matter
of WHERE the lab is in relation to the people taking it. It's a matter of
the Cisco facility in the area. I.e. SJC is HQ with TAC, RTP is a very
large campus with TAC, Dallas has a large campus with TAC, etc. I would
imagine Cisco only has sales offices in NY.
At 03:39 PM 8/14/2002, Jim Brown wrote:
>I heard a while ago, Denver was slated as the next lab site? This might
only
>be a rumor. I also heard the canned the idea when everything went South.
>
>Denver would make sense though. It is approximately half-way between the
>other two sites and in the middle of the country.
>
>As far as the backlog is concerned, Cisco changed to the one day format
from
>the two day format and fixed the backlog problem, right? Look how much
>shorter the backlog is! ;-)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Steve Router [mailto:route2hell@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:14 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: CCIE LAB IN NY (It will never happen?)
>
>
>What would it take for CISCO to open a lab in NY area ? OR in any other
>locations with a waiting list out the door there was to be a better way to
>test in more then 2 sites in the us..????
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:25 GMT-3