Re: igrp question

From: ying c (bf5tgh1@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 29 2002 - 13:49:32 GMT-3


   
Ooops, it's /24 everywhere. I've solved it by using
the secondary address.

Thanks,
Chang
--- ccie candidate <ccie1@lycos.com> wrote:
> u missed putting the masks
> --
>
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 08:31:58
> ying c wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >The topology is like below:
> >
>
>172.16.8.8--R8<-igrp->R5<-ospf->R3<-rip->R4--172.16.4.4
> >
> >The network between 2 routers is 160.60.x.x, i.e.
> >R8-160.60.58.8--igrp--160.60.58.5-R5
> >R5-160.60.53.5--ospf--160.60.53.3-R3
> >R3-160.60.34.3--rip---160.60.34.4-R4
> >
> >
> >R5 redistribute igrp and ospf
> >R3 redistribute rip (can be v1 or v2) and ospf
> >
> >The requirement is no static route, no ip
> >default-network, r8 must be able to ping r4's
> >172.16.4.4.
> >
> >So far I can only come up with one solution which
> is
> >make a tunnel between r8 and r4 and have r4 to run
> >igrp, but I don't think this is the right answer
> >though.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Chang
> >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:48 GMT-3