From: ying c (bf5tgh1@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 29 2002 - 13:33:15 GMT-3
Hi,
Please disregard. The problem can be solved by a
secondary address between r5 and r8.
Thanks,
Chang
--- ying c <bf5tgh1@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The topology is like below:
>
>
172.16.8.8--R8<-igrp->R5<-ospf->R3<-rip->R4--172.16.4.4
>
> The network between 2 routers is 160.60.x.x, i.e.
> R8-160.60.58.8--igrp--160.60.58.5-R5
> R5-160.60.53.5--ospf--160.60.53.3-R3
> R3-160.60.34.3--rip---160.60.34.4-R4
>
>
> R5 redistribute igrp and ospf
> R3 redistribute rip (can be v1 or v2) and ospf
>
> The requirement is no static route, no ip
> default-network, r8 must be able to ping r4's
> 172.16.4.4.
>
> So far I can only come up with one solution which is
> make a tunnel between r8 and r4 and have r4 to run
> igrp, but I don't think this is the right answer
> though.
>
> Thanks,
> Chang
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:48 GMT-3