Re: igrp question

From: ccie candidate (ccie1@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 29 2002 - 13:20:44 GMT-3

• Next message: ccie candidate: "RE: 350-001 money wasted"
• Previous message: ying c: "igrp question"
• Maybe in reply to: ying c: "igrp question"
• Next in thread: ying c: "Re: igrp question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
 u missed putting the masks

--
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 08:31:58
 ying c wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The topology is like below:
>
>172.16.8.8--R8<-igrp->R5<-ospf->R3<-rip->R4--172.16.4.4
>
>The network between 2 routers is 160.60.x.x, i.e.
>R8-160.60.58.8--igrp--160.60.58.5-R5
>R5-160.60.53.5--ospf--160.60.53.3-R3
>R3-160.60.34.3--rip---160.60.34.4-R4
>
>
>R5 redistribute igrp and ospf
>R3 redistribute rip (can be v1 or v2) and ospf
>
>The requirement is no static route, no ip
>default-network, r8 must be able to ping r4's
>172.16.4.4.
>
>So far I can only come up with one solution which is
>make a tunnel between r8 and r4 and have r4 to run
>igrp, but I don't think this is the right answer
>though.
>
>Thanks,
>Chang
>
>

• Next message: ccie candidate: "RE: 350-001 money wasted"
• Previous message: ying c: "igrp question"
• Maybe in reply to: ying c: "igrp question"
• Next in thread: ying c: "Re: igrp question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:48 GMT-3