From: alain faure (alainfaure@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 29 2002 - 11:14:48 GMT-3
Oups sorry, your are right i mean :
"In that case it is not different but :"
--- "VANGADASALAM,SURENDRAN (Non-HP-Singapore,ex4)"
<surendran_vangadasalam@non.hp.com> a icrit : > Hi Alain,
> It looks the same to me? How is it different in the Scenario?
>
> Regards,
> Suren
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alain faure [mailto:alainfaure@yahoo.fr]
> Sent: 29 July 2002 21:54
> To: VANGADASALAM,SURENDRAN (Non-HP-Singapore,ex4); Ccielab (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Distribute-list & Route Map
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In that case it is different but :
> maybe you will have a more refined control with route map than with
> distribute-list (compare match commands with options offered by
> access-lists).
>
> Best regards
>
> --- "VANGADASALAM,SURENDRAN (Non-HP-Singapore,ex4)"
> <surendran_vangadasalam@non.hp.com> a icrit : > Hi,
> > I am wondering what is the difference between route-map and
> > distribute-list in regards to redistribution. Is there any rule that
> details
> > the application of these different methods. An example is given below.
> >
> >
> > SCENARIO 1
> >
> > router ospf 1
> > redistribute rip route-map TEST
> >
> > access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
> >
> > route-map TEST permit 10
> > match ip address 1
> >
> > SCENARIO 2
> >
> > router ospf 1
> > redistribute rip
> > distribute-list 1 out rip
> >
> > access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
> >
> >
> > Cheers!!!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:48 GMT-3