From: Ted McDermott (tedmcdermott@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jul 28 2002 - 17:22:45 GMT-3
In Cisco - BGP Case Studies Section 4
(http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/16.html), the
author gives two solutions for suppressing the
specific local route 160.10.0.0 while advertising an
aggregate 160.0.0.0 route. Since an "aggregate
summary-only" command would not suppress the more
specific local route, the author gives two options,
both of which involve creating a static route to
null0. Neither of these would be acceptable if static
routes are not allowed. Is there any solution for this
which avoids static routes?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:47 GMT-3