From: Rick Lowery (ccie_2003@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jul 28 2002 - 14:23:53 GMT-3
----- Original Message -----
From: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
To: <ccie_2003@hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 1:11 PM
Subject: Please confirm (conf#e0d7ac47d81bf2b39d9d1294f1059ad9)
> Hi,
>
> You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's CCIELab mailing list. Because
the
> server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required
to
> authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
> spammer.
>
> PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL
> YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED.
>
> By confirming this e-mail you certify that you understand the following:
>
> 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.
>
> 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.
>
> 3. All postings become property of GroupStudy.com
>
> 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.
>
> 5. The message is NOT inflammatory.
>
> 6. The message is NOT a test message.
>
> To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once
> confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations.
>
>
> Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
>
>
> ------ORIGINAL MESSAGE---------
>
> From ccie_2003@hotmail.com Sun Jul 28 17:11:51 2002
> Received: from hotmail.com (oe24.law12.hotmail.com [64.4.18.81])
> by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA16681
> GroupStudy Mailer; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 17:11:50 GMT
> Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
> Sun, 28 Jul 2002 10:11:20 -0700
> X-Originating-IP: [68.70.163.219]
> From: "Rick Lowery" <ccie_2003@hotmail.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject: How do we properly totally stub an area?
> Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:21:31 -0400
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01C23639.AFEFCF80"
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
> Message-ID: <OE24aEkmPyAvxg3iU8w00012d76@hotmail.com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2002 17:11:20.0489 (UTC)
FILETIME=[CAF5C990:01C23659]
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C23639.AFEFCF80
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> I reading in the OSPF Command and configuration handbook that all =
> routers in a area should be configured as with the same stub area =
> type...ex. area 5 stub no-summary.. My understanding of this is only the =
> ABR would get the area 5 stub no-summary because it controls inter-area =
> LSA flow, and the other area routers in area 5 would be configured as =
> area 5 stub only.. Is this correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C23639.AFEFCF80
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
> http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3315.2869" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I reading in the OSPF Command and =
> configuration=20
> handbook that all routers in a area should be configured as with the =
> same stub=20
> area type...ex. area 5 stub no-summary.. My understanding of this is =
> only the=20
> ABR would get the area 5 stub no-summary because it controls inter-area =
> LSA=20
> flow, and the other area routers in area 5 would be configured as area 5 =
> stub=20
> only.. Is this correct?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rick</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C23639.AFEFCF80--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:47 GMT-3