From: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki (karwas@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 27 2002 - 18:56:09 GMT-3
Group,
I am afraid, that this is nothing new on the list,
but let me try to ask Yet Another Simple Redistribution Question again:
Given, that we configure redistribution on one router OSPF process
from _MULTIPLE_ different sources, like e.g. EIGRP and Connected,
what would be a precedence of such redistribution.
Please see:
Loopback 0
|
(Cloud)---OSPF---(e0 - (Router r2) - s1)---EIGRP---(Cloud)
And following config (all irrelevant stuff removed):
interface Loopback0
ip address 200.200.200.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0
ip address 137.20.20.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial1
ip address 192.168.21.1 255.255.255.0
!
router eigrp 1
network 192.168.21.0
!
router ospf 1
redistribute connected metric 200 subnets route-map LOOPBACK
redistribute eigrp 1 metric-type 1 subnets
network 137.20.20.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
!
access-list 1 permit 200.200.200.0 0.0.0.255
route-map LOOPBACK permit 10
match ip address 1
With following configuration, it looks like redistribution
into OSPF from connected seems to take precedence over redistribution
into OSPF from EIGRP, and route to 192.168.21.0/24 is gone.
Obviously it is not allowed by route-map LOOPBACK,
but this is not too clear for me, why it is not redistributed
via statement "redistribute EIGRP".
I was originally thinking that multiple redistributions will act
like an union, but now I see I was wrong.
So -- What are the rules in such situations?
Thanks,
Przemek
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:46 GMT-3