From: Fabrice Bobes (study@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 26 2002 - 13:25:03 GMT-3
If you are using the default config, you have:
Port 1:
Terminal 1
Spid1 0555100001 DN 8005551000
Terminal 3
Spid2 0555300001 DN 8005553000
Port 2:
Terminal 2
Spid1 0555200001 DN 8005552000
Terminal 4
Spid2 0555400001 DN 8005554000
The corresponding Spids for the router connected to Port 1 are:
isdn spid1 0555100001 5551000
isdn spid2 0555300001 5553000
The Spids for the router connected to Port2 are:
isdn spid1 0555200001 5552000
isdn spid2 0555400001 5554000
Have fun! The Merge 2000 is a really neat simulator.
Fabrice
We provide remote racks.
http://www.6CoLabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie candidate
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:13 AM
To: ccie candidate; ccielab@groupstudy.com; Greg Shonting
Subject: RE: Merge SPIDS
i have 12.1
when i just didnt config the spids at all everything works fine . is
there any problem for working like that ?
the switch type is basic-ni
--On Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:05:04 Greg Shonting wrote: >What version of code are you using? 12.0.7(T) has a bug that shows the
>spids and not valid when they are actually working properly. > >Greg > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jean-Francois Vaillancourt [mailto:hans@cam.org] >Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:47 AM >To: ccie candidate; ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject: Re: Merge SPIDS > > >At 2002-07-25, ccie candidate wrote: >>isdn spid1 0555100001 >> >>show isdn status ....show spid1 NOT valid . >> >>is there certain format to insert it into my router ? > > >Try putting a LDN, should clear up the message. With Basic-NI it should >still work without it, but with other switch types it may be important if >you want to accept calls on the second B channel. > >for much more see > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_invalid_spid.html >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:45 GMT-3