From: Anthony Pace (anthonypace@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 14:23:24 GMT-3
I don't believe these two local networks can communicate via DLSw+
because they will not ever go accross the "DLSw glue" as they are both
local to this router. Someone correct me if I am wrong but this would
need translational bridging (which I hope is not on my next lab
attempt)
Anthony Pace
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 07:36:11 +0200, "Krucker, Louis"
<louis.krucker@sunrise.net> said:
> Hi Group
>
> What about this
>
> source-bridge ring-group 400
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 prom
> dlsw bridge-group 2
>
> int to0/0
> ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
> ring-speed 16
> source-bridge 1 2 400
>
> int e0/0
> ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0
> bridge-group 2
>
>
> bridge 2 prot ieee
>
>
>
> Lets say the ibm mainframe is on the tokenring, if the client is on
> the ethernet, does the bridge number of ethernet and token ring have to
> be the same number ?
>
>
> cheers
> Louis
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe A [mailto:GroupStudy@comcast.net]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2002 06:29
> To: 'jinqiang yu'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: dlsw bridge-group # and Cat5k vlan id
>
>
> There is no relation
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> jinqiang yu
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:06 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: dlsw bridge-group # and Cat5k vlan id
>
>
> hi guys,
>
> I am confusing about the the relaction between dlsw
> bridge-group number and Cat5k vlan id. For example,the
> topo like this,R2(E0)----Cat5K(2/1).2/1 of Cat5K is in
> vlan 10.Can the dlsw bridge# be 10 or must be 10?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> yujq
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:42 GMT-3